Video Widget

« »
‏Afghanistan Pakistan Admiral Mike Mullen Hillary Clinton Abbottabad لیبل والی اشاعتیں دکھا رہا ہے۔ سبھی اشاعتیں دکھائیں
‏Afghanistan Pakistan Admiral Mike Mullen Hillary Clinton Abbottabad لیبل والی اشاعتیں دکھا رہا ہے۔ سبھی اشاعتیں دکھائیں

اتوار، 8 اپریل، 2012

The failure of Al-Qaeda propaganda



For several years Al-Qaeda has persevered with a relentless propaganda campaign against Pakistan, but there has been no effort on the part of the government to neutralise this blitzkrieg. Suicide bombings, targeted assassinations, kidnappings and other outrages are justified by Al-Qaeda and its affiliates as jihad. Yet the report of the Parliamentary Committee on National Security (PCNS) does not even acknowledge that the foremost threat that Pakistan faces emanates from terrorism
______________________________________________________

As recently as March 16 the local media reported that Al-Qaeda chief Ayman Al-Zawahiri released a videotaped statement in Arabic with Urdu subtitles in which he urged the people of Pakistan to “take a lead from your brothers in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Yemen and Syria” and overthrow “the bribe-taking” government and the “treacherous army.”

This statement was made only a few days before Sen Raza Rabbani presented the PCNS recommendations to the joint session of parliament, yet it was not even perceived as a threat to Pakistan’s security. Had the members of the committee taken the trouble to carry out a simple internet search they would have come across a wealth of material that would have laid bare the inconsistencies in Al-Zawahiri’s messaging to targeted audiences in the country. These could then have been used to formulate proposals to counter Al-Qaeda’s propaganda campaign against Pakistan.

For instance, in some of his earlier statements Al-Zawahiri is sympathetic to Pakistani soldiers and exhorts them to rise against their commanders, but in his subsequent pronouncements he pillories them for unforgivable perfidy. Thus, on Jan 30, 2006, the soldiers were told that “Musharraf has turned you into hunting dogs working for the Crusaders” and they were asked to rise against their “failed leadership.” The same theme is repeated with slight variations in his statements of April 29, 2006, and August 16 2008.

These appeals obviously fell flat and by August 27, 2009, the same soldiers had become despicable “Crusaders” devoid of all shame. An embittered Al-Zawahiri raved and ranted that even the Indian army was “more jealous and more concerned about the safety of their country than the Pakistani army is (for Pakistan’s).” On September 28, 2009, he described Pakistani soldiers as “low of spirit, opportunists who offer their services to the Crusaders and then flee from the battlefield and surrender when the battle gets too hard.”

Similarly, Al-Qaeda’s appeals to the Pakhtun and Baloch tribes are also riddled with contradictions and inconsistencies. These range from encomiums extolling their valour to outright condemnation of the tribes as hypocritical and treacherous turncoats.

On March 25, 2004, Al-Zawahiri had not the slightest doubt that the Pakhtun tribesmen were heroes who had “conquered India and defeated the British and the Russians.” They were also extending help to the Afghan Mujahideen as were “the dear and kind Baloch tribes.” He then appealed to the people of Pakistan, and “the Pakhtun tribes in particular,” to exact revenge for the killing of “the grandsons of the Companions (Arab fighters in the region) who became their neighbours.”

The love affair did not last long. Two years later, on April 13, 2006, Al-Zawahiri accused “one the tribes” of betraying “the Mujahideen” for a fistful of American dollars, despite their solemn pledge “to host them and protect them.”

In the autumn of 2009 a key Al-Qaeda commander, Ibn al-Shaikh al-Libi, was killed in a drone strike and on October 4 that year Al-Zawahiri again accused “one of the tribes” of informing the US about Al-Libi’s whereabouts, although they were honour-bound to “protect him and his brothers.” The men from the tribe were described as “herds of hypocrites” whose consciences were for sale to the “arrogant American force... (which) cannot fight without terrible bombardment.”

On November 11 last year, Al-Zawahiri conceded for the first time that many Al-Qaeda fighters had been captured since 2001 because they had been betrayed by several “of the Pakistani tribes.” On previous occasions he had been blaming only one or the other of the tribes but now the entire tribal structure was castigated for duplicity.

Al-Zawahiri’s messaging to the people in the settled areas of Pakistan, unlike his appeals to the tribal Pakhtuns and the military, has been more consistent and is founded on exploiting nationalist impulses and anti-Americanism. This is identical to the posture adopted by the rightwing political parties of Pakistan and extremist groups with fanciful Islamic names.

The variations of this leitmotif in Al-Zawahiri’s statements are: the US does not want Pakistan to become a Central Asian power (March 25, 2004); Washington’s aim is to fragment Pakistan and Musharraf had surrendered the country’s “strategic depth to the US in Afghanistan” (April 20, 2006); Pakistan was “a hope and a bastion” for the Islamic world but Musharraf had compromised the country’s sovereignty (August 16, 2008); Obama wants to take over and control Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal (June 2, 2009).

But these elements also constitute Al-Qaeda’s own game plan for the region, as was recently proclaimed by its henchman, Omar Khalid Khorasani, the leader of a Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan faction in Mohmand Agency. The local print media reported on March 21 that in a video released on jihadist web forums, Khorasani announced that his group sought to overthrow the government, impose Sharia, seize Pakistan’s nuclear weapons, and wage jihad till “the caliphate is established across the world.”

In Al-Zawahiri’s actual scheme of things Pakistan would become a marginalised and weak component of a caliphate without borders, and certainly not “a Central Asian power” or a “bastion” of the Islamic world, as he professes in his deceit-saturated messages to Pakistan nationals. In this vision of an Al-Qaeda empire, it will be a Saudi or an Egyptian caliph who will control Pakistan’s nuclear assets and oversee the country’s governance.

Al-Zawahiri’s concern for the “surrender” of Pakistan’s “strategic depth to the US in Afghanistan” reveals Al-Qaeda’s own objectives in the region. The perpetuation of turmoil in Afghanistan will enable it to re-establish itself there, and this, in turn, underlines the need for Pakistan to play an immediate but non-intrusive role in facilitating an intra-Afghan dialogue, so that sustainable peace and stability is restored in Afghanistan.

The alternative is chaos, which is bound to spill over into Pakistan, and the only beneficiaries will be Al-Qaeda and its affiliates who will have thus acquired “strategic depth” in a Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. Furthermore there will be an influx of two to three million refugees into Pakistan, which will be impossible for the country to sustain.

The inconsistencies in Al-Qaeda statements betray both panic and increasing frustration over its inability to achieve its ambitions in the region. The inescapable conclusion is that it has been considerably weakened because of the success of the military operations and the refusal of the tribal Pakhtuns to do its bidding.

What is also needed is a parallel effort to counter the Al-Qaeda propaganda broadside against Pakistan. The government, which has the habit of forming commissions and committees on any and every thing under the sun, should constitute a cell consisting of representatives from the ministries of information and interior to collate Al-Qaeda statements, expose their contradictions, translate these into Urdu and Pashto and disseminate them widely with the help of the print and electronic media.

The compilation should also include Al-Zawahiri’s betrayal of Essam al-Qamari, a key member of the Maadi cell of the Egyptian Islamic Jehad (EIJ) in 1981, his intrigues against EIJ founder Aboud al-Zumar in 1991, his alleged involvement in the assassination of Al-Qaeda’s ideological founder Abdullah Azzam in 1989 and the suspected tip-off by his associates to US intelligence that led to the killing of Osama bin Laden last May. This would also be the first essential step towards winning the propaganda war against terrorist groups.
____________________________________________________

 By S Iftikhar Murshed
The writer is the publisher of Criterion Quarterly. Email: iftimurshed@ gmail.com

The News International The News International - latest and breaking news about Pakistan, world, sports, cricket, business, entertainment, weather, education, lifestyle; opinion & blog





Thank You For Reading.
_______________________________________________________

جمعہ، 3 جون، 2011

Redefine relations with the US

Hillary Clinton has ofteh been candid in acknowledging Pakistan`s role in the war on terror, but she should understand that the things could "turn" for the better only when America moved forward on the basis of mutual respect and mutual interest, not in the mould of master-slave relationship.
_________________________________________________________ 

By Mohammad Jamil

Last week, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton came to Pakistan on an unannounced visit arguably to ease festering tensions. She expressed commitment to bilateral relations, and gave the soothing effect by stating “there was no evidence that top Pakistani officials had any knowledge of the al-Qaeda leader’s whereabouts”. She met with political and military leaderships and attended a news conference with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen where she described the relationship with Pakistan as having reached a “turning point”. Hillary Clinton has often been candid in acknowledging Pakistan’s role in the war on terror, but she should understand that the things could ‘turn’ for the better only when America moved forward on the basis of mutual respect and mutual interest, not in the mould of master-slave relationship. If the US has certain expectations from Pakistan, so has Pakistan from the US; and it too wants its interests to be taken care of and its concerns addressed. It can’t be that Washington has only to dictate and Islamabad has only to obey. America has indeed been giving economic and military aid, but Pakistan also served American interests sometimes to the detriment of national interests.Hillary Clinton also said that anti-Americanism in Pakistan and conspiracy theories would not pay. She must know that this public sentiment is against the American government and not the American people, because a great majority of Americans do not like war and wish to live in peace. Fact of the matter is that the feeling is deeply-ingrained in the people’s minds for persistent betrayals by the US, at times in their crucial moments e.g., Pakistan was betrayed in 1965 and 1971’s wars with India. After Soviet forces were deployed in Afghanistan in 1979, Pakistan became the frontline state, and they were forced to withdraw from Afghanistan in late 1980s. Once again, the country was ditched conveniently and remorselessly by America. It has to be mentioned that the militants and terrorists the US and Pakistan are fighting today are yesteryears jihadis who were motivated to join jihad and funded by the US, the West and the Arab world. Anyhow, Pakistan and America are allies in war on terror, and Pakistan seems to have weaned off the strategic depth syndrome. Its desire to have a friendly and not hostile government is a natural like every country would desire.There have been ups and downs in relations between the US and Pakistan, but since the Raymond Davis episode, relations became strained. However, after the unilateral action by American Special Forces in Abbottabad showing utter disregard to Pakistan’s sovereignty, the relations between Pakistan and the United States are at the lowest ebb. Reports abound that the ISI has been sharing information with the CIA that led to the arrest of scores of al-Qaeda leaders and operatives. And the CIA could unearth Osama bin Laden on the information about a cell-phone call emanating from the compound. Yet, the CIA blamed Pakistan for hiding information about Osama bin Laden. With the existing level of distrust, America’s insistence on doing more, and balking at Pakistan’s concerns, Pakistan should redefine relations with America and tell frankly what can be done and what can’t be done. American leadership should not blame Pakistan for its flawed policy of shock and awe and not putting enough boots on the ground when the US attacked Afghanistan to overthrow the Taliban. The result was that Osama bin Laden and other leaders first moved to Kunar to FATA to settled areas in Pakistan. It was indeed the responsibility of the US and its allies to stop them and arrest them on their side of the Pak-Afghan border. It should also be borne in mind that 9/11 was a monumental intelligence failure, and so was the Mumbai intelligence on 26th November 2008. Osama bin Laden was not an ordinary man; he had challenged the super power. His decision to reside at Abbottabad could be result of his fertile mind, as a residence close to Pakistan Military Academy was indeed a safe place in the sense nobody could even imagine that the most wanted man was staying there. Though Pakistan has been America’s ally in war on terror, American and western media have been insinuating its military and the premier agency for ensconcing al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders, which is travesty of the truth. The fact remains, Pakistan has suffered from terrorists of al-Qaeda and Pakistan Tehrik-e-Taliban that have killed more than 3,500 personnel of law enforcing agencies, and many more have become invalid. At least 35,000 people have been killed because of suicide and bomb attacks. Can anyone with average common sense believe that Pakistan army and ISI help the terrorists just to get killed by them?A lot of confusion has been created by the statements from members of the Obama administration, giving rise to suspicions and trust-deficit. American media, especially print media had been carrying reports regarding American plans to take control of Pakistan nukes, should the government fail or terrorists take over Islamabad. Members of Bush administration, think tanks and analysts have been trying to raise fears in the minds of international community that militants might capture power in Pakistan, and thus take control of Pakistan’s nukes. Pakistan considers such conjectures as utterly absurd. If America does not know the venue of nukes stocks and delivery system, how terrorists or militants could reach the nukes that are protected under multi-layered system. American leadership has also been casting aspersions on Pakistani military and the ISI, which ultimately would go against the interest of the United States. After 2nd May’s unilateral action, President Obama said if there was information about high-value target of al-Qaeda, the US would resort to similar action. If Pakistan is pushed against the wall, and it reacts, both Pakistan and the US are likely to suffer.Last year, Admiral Mike Mullen had said: “Pakistan must be sensitive to the US security interests”. What Pakistani leadership had been doing since the US invasion of Afghanistan, if not this, even to the detriment of its own national interests? In fact, since 1950s, Pakistan has been looking after American interests by joining pacts with the West and bilateral agreement with the US? When US spy plane U-2 took off from American base at Badhber near Peshawar and was shot down by Soviet Union, whose interest Pakistan served? Of course, Pakistan was dismembered in the process, as former Soviet Union had fully backed India in her designs to disintegrate Pakistan. But Pakistan once again became the frontline state after Soviet forces entered Afghanistan in late 1970s just to serve American interest. It is Pakistan that is making all the sacrifices yet receiving all the blame and punishment for their failures. At least for once, the United States should be honest, confess their blunders and failures in Afghanistan and acknowledge Pakistan’s tremendous sacrifices.