Corruption in Indian Army has created great cynicism among citizens because the armed forces were always held in high esteem by them. While corruption in civic society though undesirable, has been seen all over the world corruption in the Indian Army is reprehensible and utterly unacceptable. If the citizens cannot trust the guardians of country, who can they trust at all?
_________________________________________________________________
A TV channel recently showed a sting operation in which a junior commissioned officer is caught on camera handling wads of currency
notes allegedly obtained from prospective candidates for various jobs
in the military with a colonel-rank officer operating in the background.
A Major General of Indian army is caught red-handed taking money
from a contractor. These two are the more recent incidents of
corruption in the Army. One is from down South, near Pune (National
Defence Academy), and the other from up North in J and K. Earlier we had
the case of Sukna land scam in the East where a few Lt-Generals were
involved and were duly court-martialled. The DG, Supply Corps, a
Lt-General rank officer, is court-martialled on charges of corruption.
A few from very high echelons of the Army are involved in the Adarsh housing society scam. The Supreme Commander
of the armed forces, forsaking the very propriety of the act,
reportedly made a desperate attempt to grab the military’s land in Pune.
A more recent development is that of the nudging by the Supreme Court
to hold court-martial of a number of officers involved in fake
encounters at Pathribal in J and K, though the military should have done
so on its own. Colonel Purohit has been associated with a terrorist
groups and extremist Hindu outfits. If all this is not enough, a second
incidence of gross indiscipline in a unit at Nyoma in Ladakh leads one
to infer that it is not only probity and integrity that are under
assault but discipline also is on the wane. Corruption, malfeasance,
fake encounters, ill-discipline, etc, from one end of the country to the
other and right across the rank structure, give the impression that all is not well with our military.
During the last few decades the composition of
manpower intake, both of officer class and the rank and file, has
undergone a sea change. The military is simply not able to get suitable
material, not only in the officer cadre, but in recruitment of soldiers
too. With the opening of the economy and expansion in civil services, a
number of lucrative options are on offer for the youth. Those likely to join the military as soldiers find the state and central police forces as a better option. Faced with these constraints, has the military lowered its intake standards?
In the early 1980s, army headquarters ordered a study to review the system of recruitment and selection for entry into the officer cadre. I headed the committee constituted to examine and review
the officer selection system. Though the selection process had stood
the test of time, military career as such had become least attractive
and, as a result
of that, a fewer number of suitable candidates had been opting to join
the officer cadre. Consequent to this development, there was discernible
tinkering with the selection process. Since then there has possibly
been further lowering of intake standards!
The officer selection process is based on a triad system of evaluation. In this system three different techniques are applied over a period of four to five days to assess a candidate’s ability. When these three techniques
are applied correctly, they are expected to produce the same result,
thus reinforcing the selection process three times over. It also
eliminates the possibility of fudging the result by an operator of any
of the three techniques without being found out. When applied correctly,
it is the most comprehensive and authentic selection process devised so
far anywhere, in any army. Of late, the DRDO has managed to bring in
some changes in the selection process, perhaps for the worse. During the
eighties the DRDO, working on
the recruitment intake standards, had projected that weight carrying
capacity had no bearing on the height of a person and other physical
attributes and, as such, the requirement of a minimum height for
recruitment be done away with. One was constrained to observe that the
Army wanted to recruit soldiers and not coolies.
It may be argued that the military is a mere
reflection of society — where corruption is rampant, right across the
national spectrum, and is accepted and even respected. When cheating and
lack of discipline are all-pervasive, the military could not remain
unaffected. After all, the Army draws its manpower from the same stock.
Even so in this climate of loot and plunder, malfeasance and state of
lawlessness, the military has strived hard to maintain its core value
system by creating a sort of rampart of “do’s and don’ts” to isolate it from outside influence.
Of late, this rampart has been under attack,
both from outside and within and breaches have appeared, but the
military has made brave attempts at repairing this wall of core values.
Cases of corruption, misconduct, false encounters and cheating
have often manifested from within, cutting right across the rank
structure. But the military has been quick to deal firmly with all such
aberrations. Though a more recent development, venality threatens to
engulf the very top echelons of the Army.
Some may contend that the level of corruption in
the military is not even a minuscule of what prevails in the government
machinery and civil society, and, therefore, there is no need to worry
about it. Military service is quite apart from all other callings
and it demands the highest standards in probity, integrity and personal
conduct from its officers. Any shortfall in these will render the force
ineffective, and national security will stand imperilled.
Even with the lowering of intake standards, the
Army continues to remain short of over 12000 officers, thus reinforcing
the fact that over time military career has been turned into the least
attractive option. The officer cadre has seen an influx of not so
suitable leadership material and, as such, the profile of the officer
cadre has been undergoing a change for the worse. Though the military
does strive to develop leadership skills in its young officers and
instil in them an appropriate value system, in many cases it does not
succeed.
However, individual aspirations, careerism,
personal gain and dilution of leadership traits do sometimes get the
better of some individuals, but where failings in character qualities
surface, or discipline is lacking, action to correct the fault-lines is
both stern and swift. It is essential to detect fault-lines in character
at early stages of an officer’s career and apply correctives, which
could even be weeding out.
The senior leadership in the military no more insists on setting
good and enviable standards of conduct for juniors to follow. A few, at
the very top, have faltered and fallen prey to greed. As the higher
rank officers climbed into what is called
“five star culture”, quite distinct from what fits in the military’s
way of life, lower down the ladder some junior rank officers slid down
to levels unacceptable for the officer class.
Finally, the officer cadre is the very soul of
an army and mainspring of the whole mechanism. Any fall in its standards
will surely lead to failures during a war.
_________________________________________________________________
An account of an Indian General about rising corruption in Indian army
By Lt-Gen Harwant Singh (Indian Army)
___________________________________________________________________
Thank You For Reading
کوئی تبصرے نہیں:
ایک تبصرہ شائع کریں