Video Widget

« »

اتوار، 6 جون، 2010

The American Jihad & The Pakistani Revolution


A person who doesn’t acknowledge they are sick will never seek treatment. To cure any illness, the presence of sickness must first be acknowledged by the sufferer. Next comes the diagnosis by an expert doctor who will suggest a treatment. For serious diseases the treatment might mean life threatening surgery with little chance of survival. Expert medical diagnosis suggests that Pakistan is currently plagued with a mixture of many types of cancers and aids.

The cancers resulted from internal rotting cells in pretty much every vital organ that have been left unchecked for over 60 years and the aids resulted in more recent times from the ongoing unholy communion with unclean partners. A patient suffering from many types of cancers and aids at the same time will surely die short of a miracle. The doctors are helpless, the patient might live one month or a year at most but the end is imminent in our expert medical opinion. Only prayers can help this patient now.

Freedom is a relative term. An inmate sitting inside a jail cell can say he’s a free man, but an onlooker might differ. Let’s stop celebrating freedom like that naive convict. Pakistan is a Jail. The inmates have no value as they aren’t dignified human beings, but rather unfit for normal society. The inmates have essentially given up their rights to this prison system without a fair trial, in fact most of them assume they are free because the walls of the jail cells are painted with sceneries of meadows and mountains. The sentence was announced in 1947, saza-e-ba-mushakat and this sentence is being served since. If you differ with my Jail analogy then just try leaving the airport for a foreign country using a Pakistani Passport and you’ll see what I mean by Jail. A jail is a place that people will go to any lengths to escape. Pakistan is not the only jail in the world, but it is the one that is reserved for the worst of all criminals, a high security prison and everyone is looking for that ever elusive parole i.e. ‘green card’ and hates the extremists for dashing their hopes of escape, especially now after the Parole board rules have been revised due to some inmates creating a ‘bad image’ for this particular Jail.

America’s war on terror is no doubt an ideological war. People don’t fight against ideologies. Only opposing ideologies fight and common ideologies support each other. Should we call the American war a Crusade or a Jihad? I would call it a Jihad as compared to a crusade. It cannot be a crusade for the simple reason that this war is not in any way being fought for authority of the church or in any way linked to promoting christianity. If it does not qualify as a crusade then does it qualify as a Jihad? Well funnily enough in the classic definition Jihad comes from the exact same root words as the word “jid-o-jehad” which means to struggle and strive against evil. If America’s claims of fighting against terrorism are to be taken at face value then yes, America indeed is waging a Jihad. Furthermore if we accept the fact that suicide bombing is unislamic then it means that the Americans are fighting an enemy that has essentially denied Islam and descended into barbarity against the Ummah. In this light it would be incumbent upon any muslim to support the Americans in their Jihad against the forces of Evil.

In this ideological jihad, the state is struggling with its own ideology. Even if as I believe Pakistan was created for a british agenda as compared to the romantic notion of it being a prize of muslim struggle, one must not forget the best of all the planners, for surely even the devil is a mere slave carrying out the plans of the Almighty. In my mind Pakistan is like Rocky, In that movie Sylvester Stallone is a washed out small time boxer who never had his chance and then someone gives him a chance just as a publicity stunt, but Rocky takes this chance seriously and ends up standing upto the champion and giving him the fight of his life, lasting the full rounds against the undefeated world champion, thereby proving to himself and the world that he is not just another bum on the street. This is Pakistan, it got its chance in 1947 and no one thought it could succeed, but this Rocky might surprise you.

Whatever reason Pakistan was created for and whatever reasons the US is fighting and whomever the US is fighting are irrelevant. It also doesn’t matter who is friend or foe here. It seems yet again that appearance and reality are exactly opposite. I would like to suggest the idea that Pakistan is not facing a war situation but rather it is currently undergoing a massive revolution. Forget what the newspapers or Televisions say, they are working for the devil of the status quo. Pakistan might currently be the abode of the devil but this abode was built by God. This is similar to the analogy of the Kaaba which Abraham (pbuh) built for the worship of Allah but then later it was subverted into a place of idol worship. This did not in any way reduce the sacredness of the Kaaba and so even when the idols were present it was still sacred ground and once the idols were removed it was still the same kaaba but devoid of fitna. The same example applies to Pakistan. Yes it may have been created by the british to reward their loyal dogs, so what? Yes people are worshipping idols here, so what? The fact is that the US might be fighting their own battle but this war will not end without the demise of the devil and that is the main reason whether the US knows it or not, it is waging a Jihad and curing Pakistan of its diseases, even though its intention is most likely the opposite, this war might turn out to be the miracle treatment the patient so desperately needs.

The devil is a hidden whisperer urging men to commit grave sins against other humans. Those shouting anti-American slogans must realise that the devil is indeed residing in Pakistan right now but it is not America. In fact this devil had been residing in Pakistan even before the creation of the Nation. This devil has always kept a loyal band of satanic followers that have always implemented the devil’s agenda, mostly in the name of God, such is satan’s deception. Now Pakistan is a Munafiq state in Islamic terms. A state that claims to be made for Islam is now the very state fighting Islam. This is the devil in Pakistan, it is also commonly referred to as the status quo. The status quo is the devil that no common pakistani has the ability to stand up to. This devil will use all its resources and cunning to retain its stranglehold. This devil follows no religion and worships no one besides itself. This is not the devil that America is fighting but it is the devil that will die after the war is over, inshaAllah, this might require life threatening surgery which might indeed result in loss of limbs as many fear, but the pain is becoming so unbearable that the common man will cry out and cut off the cancers plaguing him, not in the well engineered superficial lawyers or lal masjid propaganda campaigns but in a manner that defies all beliefs, a revolution the likes of which the world has never seen and it is specifically this revolution which the dajjal is unable to see with his one eye, fighting his fake ideological war to preserve the devil of the status quo aided fully by the cancers that plague the society. It is this humble scribe’s hope and belief that this current war will result in a real revolution of the masses. A revolution that will turn a munafiq state into a momin state overnight. I sincerely believe that Pakistan cannot fragment but rather it will rise up in a defying act, cured of both cancer and aids, but this will only happen once the treatment is complete, even if this treatment could result in loss of limbs, there is a minute hope for total recovery and any risk is worth it. There are many days of heavy surgery ahead, but this patient has the strength to undergo all these operations without anastesia, so we should not delude ourselves by believing fairy tales from the media, rather we must look inside our souls and contemplate and create the real Pakistan, our dream Pakistan, not this imposter dajjal parading as our beloved Pakistan, the Pakistan who’s independence struggle did not end but rather began on 14th August 1947.

K. Hamdi Khan

ہفتہ، 5 جون، 2010

Terror in the name of the God of Israel


The standing military of the United States most ardent ally, Israel has killed 9 peaceful humanitarian workers in international waters on ships carrying aid to starving gentiles in Ghaza. It was all done in the name of God as the Israeli soldiers storming the ships prayed to God for the success of their mission to stop food reaching the hungry people under the blessings of their priests. Pro-Israeli organizations in America and all over the world are silent, the same way as Christians were silent when Jews were massacred by Hitler’s mainly Christian soldiers in Germany. Those who claim to champion the cause of justice among the Israelis are justifying the killing and the strongest ally of the Jewish state is still studying the situation. What a shame.

What was done is inhumane and among the ugliest form of terrorism. It is terrorism sponsored by the state. No ifs and no buts. But some refuse to see this as inhumane. Probably it is because a gentile has no value in the eyes of those who claim that God has given them all the wisdom to decide and determine the status of everyone else.

The so called holy land, today, offers the most unholy scene. Everything, the divine guidance inspires humans to accomplish is violated. Peace, human dignity, human life has no meaning. What is even more ironic is that the conflict is among people who claim that they have the most comprehensive divine guidance for justice, peace and love.

Only a sick mind can see the other human suffer. For almost 60 years, a people have been kicked out of their land and placed in holes not even fit for insects. At will they have been killed, humiliated and tormented. Only a sick mind will let the people die in hunger and face starvation. And only a sick mind will stop relief reaching the injured and wounded.

That sick mind, in our world, today is represented by those who claim to be the defenders of the Jewish state. Jews in America owe it to Americans to distance them from this thinking. Palestinians have the same human rights that Jews and Christians have and they have the same right to live in peace and security as the Israelis have.

In the last 60 years the Israelis have created a myth of insecurity to their existence. They have always argued that their tiny state is surrounded by Muslims who pose a constant threat to them. Well, in the 2,000 years of their existence, Jews have found them selves on the verge of annihilation either by Christian Romans or Christian Europe. Never, in their presence among Muslims, they ever felt that their religious existence was ever under threat. This myth is perpetuated by their sympathizers all over the world. In the US, their lobbies propagate lies and use all tactics including intimidation and coercion to influence the opinion of the so called people’s representatives.

Like all previous acts of barbarism and terror, this act too will be given a spin to save the image and to serve the interests of the Jewish state. It might be argued that members of al-Qaeda or Muslim extremist groups were on the ships carrying food. Israel can even concoct information to prosecute anyone on charges of espionage or terror. Israeli supporters in the media and Washington and other places of the world would gleefully accept those assertions and would blame the victim, a tactic that they have been using for the last six decades.

How should we respond to the situation, especially in the USA. Christians and Muslims are part of a number of interfaith dialogue groups. There are several groups that are dedicated to Jewish-Muslim relations. The Jewish leadership at every level should be asked to define its stand on this and other issues impacting human life in the occupied land. There is no point in a dialogue if one does not want to understand and recognize the humanity of the other.

There are several Jewish organizations and groups that are as sick and tired of the Israeli violent tactics as any other decent human being is. They deserve to be supported in their efforts to challenge the terrorists in Tel Aviv who have hijacked their religion and their culture and used their sufferings in the past to cause others suffer. Their voices should be joined by all those who really care for peace and justice. Fight against Israeli terror is a collective fight and everyone that stands for peace and justice is in it.

Dr. Aslam Abdullah

Operation Blue Tulsi: India & Israel against Pakistan: 15 Years in Planning, 10 Years in Preparation and Today in Execution


Operation Blue Tulsi: How India Approached Israel For Help Against Pakistan

  • PPP government dismissed in 1996 because Rehman Malik, DG FIA and Asif Zardari promised Indians and Israelis access to Pakistan’s nuclear facilities!
  • In 1994-95 Rehman Malik was working in tandem with this immediate boss Ghulam Asghar, head of the FIA, and under the auspices of Asif Ali Zardari, collecting information about Pakistan’s nuclear installations. Malik offered the Indians direct access to Kashmiri and Afghan fighters he would capture!
  • In July 2001 Janes Information Group reported that RAW and Mossad were cooperating to infiltrate Pakistan to target important religious and military personalities, journalists, judges, lawyers and bureaucrats!

In the late eighties two junior intelligence officers one Pakistani other Indian faced each other on opposite sides of the law.

The Pakistani intelligence officer had caught the Indian agent on Pakistani soil with incriminating evidence.

Indian agent knew his life had come to an end. However, everything has a price. And his freedom was worth a little less than half a million rupees.

A few days later the Indian agent was sitting back at home, free as a bird. And life went on for several more years until the fateful year of 1994 when the two old “chaps” met again. This time officially. The Indian agent had climbed the ladder to an important post in the government. At this side of the border the junior Pakistani agent, against all odds had become one of the top bosses at Federal Investigation Agency. Of course, this was the infamous Rehman Malik.

The Indian side wanted Pakistani Government’s help in reducing cross-border terrorism. But Rehman Malik offered a lot more than mere reduction in “cross-border” activity.

He had been appointed as Additional Director FIA and yielded immense power in the country. Additionally he had become the right-hand-man of Asif Ali Zardari, stashing his looted money all over the world.

Malik offered the Indians direct access to the jihadists he would capture.

Somewhere along the line Israel also became a party to the deal and soon Mossad agents were carrying out investigations of the captured (ISI backed) jihadists on Pakistani soil. There were millions to be made from the deal and of course Rehman Malik was working in tandem with this immediate boss Ghulam Asghar, head of the FIA and under the auspices of Asif Ali Zardari.

ISI, Pakistan Military and top brass quietly kept a close watch. Although painful but capture of a few foot soldiers was bearable in the bigger national interest.

By 1995, in a little over a year the, Benazir Bhutto government had expelled 2000 Arab mujahideen of the Afghan-Soviet War and imprisoned a number of Pakistani mujahideen. More significantly, Benazir Bhutto on her official visit to the US in April 1995 met in secret with an Israeli delegation. On her return she faced stiff resistance from a segment of civilian and military bureaucracy. Her meetings with India and Israel had generated great suspicions. Just four months later she thwarted a coup attempt against her headed by Major General Zahirul Islam Abbasi. Director General of Military Intelligence Major General Ali Kuli Khan tipped-off General Abdul Waheed Kakar who immediately ordered Chief of General Staff Lt. General Jehangir Karamat to suppress the coup. A total of 36 army officers and 20 civilians were arrested from Islamabad and Rawalpindi.

Then in November 1995 the Egyptian Embassy in Islamabad was blown up in a car bomb. Al-Qaeda was quick to claim it. Although the real reasons of the handlers of the bombers remain hidden to this day, but in the following days a silent but significant event happened. General Abdul Waheed Kakar who was given an extension in his tenure declined it and Lt. General Jehangir Karamat was appointed as the Army Chief by the then President Farooq Leghari on 18 December, 1995.

Lt. General Jehangir Karamat was the senior most general at the time, therefore the least controversial within the military – something which the military desperately needed at the time. The other three generals who were in the position to become COAS were Lt. Gen Javed Ashraf Qazi, Lt. Gen Naseer Akhtar, and Lt Gen Mohammad Tariq.

Lt. Gen. Ghulam Muhammad Malik had already retired in October 1995. Maj. Gen. Naseem Rana was heading the ISI at the time, taking his charge in October 1995. Lt. Gen. Shujat Ali Khan was heading the ISI’s Internal Wing.

In the backdrop of these events in Pakistan, in March 1995 Israel’s Air Force chief had visited India with an entourage that included key Mossad officials. It was at this point that in a meeting Pakistan’s nuclear program was discussed. A year later Indian nuclear and missile program head Abdul Kalam had a “top secret” visit to Israel in June 1996.

It was “top secret” because no one knew about it. As it turned out, everyone knew about it even before he left India. All the much publicized secrecy and visit of such a top level official achieved the aim and nearly nobody bothered with the entourage which included a manager from the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) – Alok Tiwari. The “top secret” meetings between Abdul Kalam and his Israeli counterparts were related to purchase of UAVs. However, in every single one of those “top secret” meetings Alok Tiwari was missing. With all the attention focused on Abdul Kalam and his “top secret” meetings no one noticed the odd thing.

Just a few days later, after coming back to India Tiwari accompanied Air Chief Marshal S. K. Sareen to Israel in July 1996. In fact this was his third trip. He had also visited Israel in April 1996 along with India’s first Defense Attaché to Israel.

First Wave

The effect was immediate. In late July 1996 MQM organized a province-wide strike. Simultaneously a large bomb exploded at Lahore airport and a second at a Faisalabad railway station. On 14 August 1996, 12 SSP [an extremist religious group] activists were gunned down during an Independence Day Rally by unidentified gunmen. By end of August, Punjab had been engulfed in sectarian violence, Shias and Sunnis were being gunned down in broad daylight. The political and security situation worsened by the murder of Murtaza Bhutto and reinstatement of Manzoor Wattoo as Chief Minister of Punjab. The country seemed in a political and economic turmoil with violence erupting throughout the country. At the same time, out of the blue Ataullah Mengal returned from his self-imposed exile.

While everyone was busy with the current crisis a team of agents working directly under Rehman Malik were gathering information on Kahuta and A.Q. Khan. Beginning November 1996, ISI saw an increase in Indian troop movements, which finally sent alarm bells ringing through the echelons of Rawalpindi and Islamabad.

Suddenly, all the pieces fell in place and Ghulam Asghar and Rehman Malik’s shenanigans seemed a lot deeper than mere money grabbing tactics. By fourth of November a thick load of evidence had been gathered on Ghulam Asghar and Rehman Malik working with the consent of Asif Ali Zardari towards gathering information on the progress of Pakistan’s nuclear program.

On 5 November 1996, Farooq Leghari dissolved Benazir Bhutto’s government. At the other side of the border, this caused the immediate visit of Israeli naval chief Vice-Admiral Alex Tal to India. Back at home, Ghulam Asghar and Rehman Malik were imprisoned on undisclosed charges. Pakistan had narrowly escaped the storm that was brewing in its mists.

Second Wave

In February 1997, Indian Defense Secretary T. K. Banerji led a high level defense delegation to Israel to discuss the “exchange of technology” between the two countries. Other than the official purpose the most important topic was Pakistan’s nuclear program. By the end of the visit the two countries had decided to do “whatever” it takes to neutralize the threat.

In March next year the BJP won Indian elections and one of the immediate policies adopted was to tackle Pakistan’s nuclear issue by any means possible. With such enthusiastic approach the government even decided to take the most extreme measures if needed. In the following two months the official and diplomatic delegations between India and Israel came to a halt. There was a sudden rise however in the exchange of non-diplomatic delegations between the two countries. The last official visit was of Gen. Prakash Malik to Israel in March 1998, who was also the first serving Indian Chief of Army Staff to visit Israel since normalization.

In April 1998 two out-of-the ordinary incidents happened. Air India announced its discontinuation of Tel Aviv flight on 1 April 1998 and early April the Confederation of Indian Industries announced an unplanned “Study Mission” to Israel. This was the prelude to the second wave which officially started on 11 May 1998 when India exploded its nuclear bombs.

Night of 27-28 May 1998

Pakistan resisted testing its nuclear bombs for nearly two weeks until 27 May 1998. On 27 May 1998 in a top level meeting Lt. Gen. Naseem Rana, DG ISIP, briefed the Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and army chief on the increasing intelligence reports of possible Indian attack on Pakistan’s nuclear installations.

The panic this briefing created was nothing compared to the next two briefings.

The first report pertained to the sighting of an unidentified F-16 aircraft at the periphery of Pakistan’s airspace on 27 May 1998. Knowing India did not have F-16s, the obvious suggestion was the presence of Israeli Air Force jets in the area (especially with the reports of Indian COAS visiting Israel just a month earlier). And the second report coming just before 1:00 am on 28 May 1998 recorded unusual movements of Indian aircrafts just across the border which suggested India was preparing for preventive airstrikes against Pakistan. The seven nuclear tests of 28 May 1998 were an obvious response.

The tests confirmed once and for all that Pakistan is a nuclear power.

Deduction

It seemed probable that BJP government had decided to explode its nuclear bombs in order to force Pakistan into testing its own devices—if it had any. After a delay of two weeks, doubts had started rising in nearly every analytical discourse that Pakistan did not have the nuclear capability or it would have responded. The Indian thinking was that this was the golden opportunity to take out Pakistan’s nuclear installations before Pakistan gets that capability. The important visit of Indian COAS to Israel in March 1998 – in the light of proceeding events – could only be regarding Israel’s support for the planned attack. But whatever the Indian reasons and aims for engaging Israel, the end result was Pakistan’s success in establishing itself as a nuclear power state. This Pakistani move has completely changed the Great Nuclear Game in the region.

Third Wave

Pakistan’s test firing of nuclear bombs was a shock for the rest of the world. No one expected, in the first place for Pakistan to have the capability and secondly to explode them even if it had the capability. For India and Israel, the two top-most interested parties in destroying Pakistan’s nuclear assets, this meant a complete overhaul of their strategy.

A year later the Indian National Security Adviser Brajesh Mishra came to meet Ehud Barak in September 1999 and this time he was accompanied by a familiar face – Alok Tiwari. Within a year, Alok Tiwari and another security analyst finalized a document based on their discussions the preceding year.

In June 2000, L. K. Advani visited Israel where new deals related to Mossad and Shabak espionage and cooperation with RAW were finalized and as a result Israel was allowed to establish its own network to operate from in India. Also, L.K. Advani discussed Pakistan’s nuclear program and the chances of coordination between the two countries on a possible strike to denuclearize Pakistan. During the visit, Alok Tiwari’s report was also discussed.

By July 2000 a heavy deployment of Israeli agents in Indian Occupied Kashmir was reported. Near the end of 2000 Israel’s top intelligence officers were reported to have visited India and discussed amongst other issues, Kashmir and Pakistan’s nuclear assets. One of the meetings on the agenda was regarding the report Alok Tiwari had prepared which had gone through considerable changes in Israel. By the end of the visit the top spies of the two countries had agreed to cooperate on the operation detailed inside a thick volume titled, “Operation Blue Tulsi”.

Operation Blue Tulsi: The Preparations

We do not know what was written inside the report Operation Blue Tulsi. But we can ascertain some of it by the events it had led to beginning 2001.

Preparation for the mega Operation Blue Tulsi began fervently in early 2001. By mid 2001 eyebrows were being raised over RAW and Mossad’s cooperation and in July 2001 Janes Information Group reported that RAW and Mossad are cooperating to infiltrate Pakistan to target important religious and military personalities, journalists, judges, lawyers and bureaucrats. In addition, bombs would be exploded in trains, railway stations, bridges, bus stations, cinemas, hotels and mosques of rival Islamic sects to incite sectarianism. At the same time the Balochistan Liberation Army rose out of dead like a second incarnation and Balach Marri a Moscow graduate declares himself as the leader of BLA. Within weeks in Balochistan numerous training camps sprouted with each camp reported to be training up to a hundred militants. Agents from RAW, Mossad and CIA operating in Afghanistan started moving in.

In mid 2001 reports appeared that Special Operations Division of Mossad, also known as Metsada, specializing in assassinations and sabotage, has been based in India since May 2001 to train RAW operatives and Mossad and Shin Bet or Shabak were operating a number of teams in Indian Held Kashmir and were also operating a delicate spy network from Indian soil. In July 2001 RAW increased its budget for Indian consulates in Afghanistan by nearly 10 times.

Within days after 9/11, a story was leaked in the press that Pakistan is dismantling and spreading its nuclear assets to safer places implying that it would be much more difficult to pinpoint them and much more easier for extremists to get hold of. These news stories were shortly followed by another piece on 28 October 2001 which stated that Pentagon was looking into plans to dispatch an elite unit into the Pakistan to disarm its nuclear arsenal. The special unit which was trained to slip into foreign countries to ferret out and disarm nuclear weapons and operated under Pentagon control with CIA assistance and would be getting special help from Israel’s Sayeret Matkal also known as Unit 262.

On 22 December 2001 C. Raja Mohan wrote, “There is a growing belief in New Delhi that the time has come to call Pakistan’s nuclear bluff. If it does not, India places itself in permanent vulnerability to cross-border terrorism from Pakistan … India is now confronted with the possibility that its restraint in the face of nuclear escalation is taken as a fundamental weakness. India must deal with the possible assessment in Pakistan that its nuclear capability has foreclosed all conventional military options.”

At the same time on the other side of the globe, Prof. Stephen P. Cohen was saying, “South Asia may have reached a point where the two countries (India and Pakistan) are really bent on hurting each other one way or another and it may be time to consider more unilateral, more forceful American steps – diplomatically and economically forceful – to get compliance from India and Pakistan separately on some vital concerns. Clearly, we may have reached a point where the peace process is simply too little, too late, and we may have to turn to other forms of diplomacy.”

These two writers one from US and the other from India very implicitly had voiced their respective governments’ policies towards Pakistan’s nuclear assets.

In December 2001 Indian PM, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, while addressing the parliament said, “the question was not whether there should be or should not be a war, [the question was] under what circumstances there will be war … and whether there will be a war.”

Of course the underlying message was, whether India should attack a nuclear armed country or a country which has lost its nuclear capabilities.

In December 2001 Benazir Bhutto while visiting India said in her interviews, “President, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, as an army general, had planned the Kargil invasion in Jammu and Kashmir while I was the Prime Minister.” Later she also said, “Pakistan army as an institution had brought back Osama bin Laden”.

This rhetoric of Benazir Bhutto was perfectly in line with the agreement signed by US and India in 2002.

Late in 2002 US and India signed an agreement on cooperation in disarming Pakistan’s nuclear assets and the two-player offensive team of Operation Blue Tulsi found a third partner in the form of CIA. As a result of this deal Abdullah Mehsud was freed from Guantanamo Bay and returned to Pakistan with millions of dollars in cash.

Benazir Bhutto’s statements in India were the major reason Pervez Musharraf’s declaration of Benazir Bhutto as a “security risk” during a chat with Pakistan’s leading editors and correspondents in April 2002. Pakistani security agencies already had a great deal of intelligence regarding Benazir Bhutto, Asif Zardari and Rehman Malik’s involvement with Mossad and India in 1995-96 and their collaboration against Pakistan’s nuclear assets.

In January 2002 under orders from L. K. Advani RAW and other intelligence agencies submitted a detailed report on military options for solving Kashmir issue and in case of a full-fledged war, for neutralizing Pakistan’s nuclear assets. One major outcome of the report was the creation of Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) in March 2002 with the authority to conduct external operations supported by a huge budget.

Also, a Lawyers’ Struggle surfaced in October 2003 under the leadership of Hamid Ali Khan (now drowned under the infamous Lawyers’ Movement). The first prominent protest of the “struggle” was held on 15 October 2003 in which the President of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) Hamid Ali Khan said, “Musharraf’s very presence within the army and holding of other important offices and Shaikh Riaz Ahmad’s continuation as chief justice after his retirement are undoubtedly illegal and unconstitutional … Let’s think collectively, move forward collectively and act collectively to outs usurper generals and judges (who had collaborated with Pervez Musharraf including Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry).

However, like a B-grade movie twist, four years later Iftikhar Chaudry becomes the hero to these same lawyers who wanted to oust him. Like a script from the past, this protest had followed a “Long March”. And the “struggle” then moved to other cities one by one.

At this point along with Hamid Ali Khan, Kazim Khan was at the forefront. Lacking the charisma and cunning of their successors, and because of the assassination of a major politician, and because of the shortage of “unlimited” billions of rupees at their disposal, this Lawyers’ Struggles has been confined to the dusty pages of history with their names ascribed against the words, “traitors”.

Also, there is no evidence to support that the assassination attempts on Pervez Musharraf were somehow related to the timing of the Lawyers’ Struggle. (See: Black Revolution: Pakistan’s Lawyers Movement: The Bush Administration’s Last Color Revolution).

By mid 2004, the government had ample evidence that BLA and some Baloch leaders were conspiring against the government, aided by foreign countries.

On 13August 2004, the Chief Minister of Baluchistan, Jam Muhammad Yousaf is quoted by The Herald (Sep 2004-Karachi) as saying: “Indian secret services (RAW) are maintaining 40 terrorist camps all over the Baloch territory”.

While this was happening on the ground, there was talk of ‘peace talks’ with the terrorists everywhere. People like Jan Muhammad Jamali became a laughing stock of the media because he dared to suggest that there were foreign agents operating in Balochistan. Unfortunately, many in the Pakistani media ridiculed these statements then.

In any case, it was already too late then. The preparations for the Operation Blue Tulsi were nearly complete and the Government of Pakistan had wasted all opportunities for stopping the inevitable.

Operation Blue Tulsi: Start

Jan. 1, 2005 was the starting date. The local agents got the signal and the operation started with the ominous rape of a female doctor in Sui on 2 January 2005.

As expected the incident created headlines all around and culprits not being found created a widespread indignation. This was shortly followed by the firing of hundreds of small rockets at gas installation in Sui on 7 January 2005 which put a hole in the supply of gas to the rest of the country for an entire week.

2005 was a busy year with terrorists claiming to represent Pakistani Baloch citizens continuously creating havoc in Balochistan and adjacent areas and ended with the assassination attempts on Musharraf in December.

After President Gen. Pervez Musharraf escaped a rocket attack on his life in December 2005 and the Inspector General Frontier Corps survived an assassination attempt, Navtej Sarna, the Indian External Affairs Ministry spokesman said, “The Government of India has been watching with concern the spiraling violence in Balochistan and the heavy military action, including the use of helicopter gunships and jet fighters by the Government of Pakistan to quell it … We hope the Government of Pakistan will exercise restraint and take recourse to peaceful discussions to address the grievances of the people of Balochistan”.

The Indian Government had realized that the two assassination attempts would surely result in backfire on the Indian assets in Balochistan, which it needed to safeguard for its final aim, especially Akbar Bugti. Just as suspected, the Government of Pakistan intensified its operation against the terrorist militants claiming to represent Pakistani Baloch citizens.

In April 2006 the Government of Balochistan in exile is set up with its offices in Jerusalem under one Azaad Khan Baloch.

In a laughingly stupid mistake, Azaad Khan Baloch who claims to represent Pakistani Balochis decided to spell his name according to Hindi transliteration with a double “a” in Az”aa”d, rather than a single “a” as used in Pakistan, i.e. Azad.

What is more probable is that whoever this Azad [or the Hindi Azaad] Khan Baloch is, he is definitely not a Pakistani Baloch.

Meanwhile in Balochistan the government operation against Akbar Bugti intensified. Bugti took shelter in the rugged mountain range and coordinated the activities of his militants from there. Ultimately the military found him and during the process of capture Akbar Bugti died because of cave-roof collapse on 26 August 2006.

This proved a minor setback in the overall plans. However, beginning 2007 events in the country took a completely different turn. Starting March 2007, every incident occurring in the country was tied to the aim of ousting Pervez Musharraf, including the much profitable Lawyers’ Movement. Intelligence agencies were having a field-day bringing in pile after pile of reports proving the involvement of CIA, RAW, Mossad and MI6 towards Musharraf’s ouster. True to some extent but contrary to most analyses at the time, the ouster of Pervez Musharraf was just one milestone towards the main goal.

The efforts of the Pakistani counterespionage effort went into controlling the situation to secure Musharraf, while in the backdrop, silently the wheels kept turning. While Punjab, Sind, Balochistan were burning Swat was sitting quietly unnoticed and out of radar. Within a period of a few months, the numbers of ‘Pakistani Taliban’ in Swat surged and just their ammunition and their military hardware did. Some of this hardware was more advanced to what the Pakistani soldiers used.

A portion of this military hardware ended up in the ill-fated Lal Masjid. While intelligence and military were busy keeping Musharraf’s seat safe in Pakistan, a new political game started in the UAE.

Rehman Malik enthusiastically started pursuing the goal of National Reconciliation Ordinance. He became instrumental in the final deal between Benazir Bhutto, US and Pervez Musharraf and NRO.

ANOTHER SMOOTH OPERATOR BEHIND THIS OPERATION WAS HUSAIN HAQQANI WHO INCREASED HIS VALUE BY TRANSFORMING HIMSELF INTO A CONDUIT BETWEEN MRS. BHUTTO AND THE WASHINGTON ESTABLISHMENT. MR. HAQQANI CONVINCED HER OF MAKING PRO-AMERICAN STATEMENTS IN PUBLIC IN ORDER TO CONVINCE WASHINGTON THAT SHE MUST BE BROUGHT BACK TO POWER IN ISLAMABAD].

Since Benazir Bhutto did not have much to lose without NRO she was never very interested in this controversial piece of legislation. That was the reason two options were thrown at Musharraf, i.e. either eliminate the two-term condition or introduce NRO. Rehman Malik on the other hand, was vehemently pursuing NRO, as of the three (Asif Ali Zardari, Benazir Bhutto and Rehman Malik) the Government of Pakistan only had clear evidence against Rehman Malik and it was enough to put him in jail for life (i.e. involvement in espionage and working with Mossad and RAW). However, at that point no one knew the real motivations of Rehman Malik other than that he was working to get the path clear for Benazir’s return. Amazingly, the FBI also was putting its weight behind NRO rather than eliminate the two term condition. If US really wanted to see Benazir Bhutto as Prime Minister of Pakistan logic says Washington would have lobbied for striking down that law that prevented Bhutto from assuming office for a third term. It needs to be noted here that Rehman Malik had also tried to do a similar deal in 2005, which never materialized. This time it did.

Near the end of 2007, the intelligence and the military were convinced that a conspiracy had been hatched in the country with the sole aim of removing Musharraf from power.

The Assassination of Benazir Bhutto, simultaneous riots throughout the country, terrorist activities occurring in every province, all of this had considerable similarities to the Bush Administration-backed Color Revolutions. In order to keep Musharraf in power the government kept giving into one demand after the other. As a result Rehman Malik becomes head of Interior Ministry, Yusuf Raza Gilani becomes the Prime Minister of Pakistan and sweeping changes are made in the security and intelligence community. Still, the government saw the war finally over when in one move Gilani puts ISI under the Interior Minister on 27 July 2008. Until that time ISI and the top brass had thought all Rehman Malik wanted was to get rid of extremist elements from ISI and Pakistan’s establishment.

It was the end of July 2008 when the alarm bells started ringing again in the high echelons of power in Pakistan. The intelligence machinery went into extra high gear and after millions of dollars later it came back with a name: Operation Blue Tulsi.

Operation Blue Tulsi: the Revelation

The establishment only now realized the full extent of the operation which they had been witnessing since the beginning of 2000. More worryingly, the current operation had eerily similar modus operandi to the 1995-96 debacle – which hardened the resolve of the nation to strengthen the security of its nuclear assets – just that this time the plan to take them out was vastly more sophisticated and bigger in size. In matter of hours the priorities changed. Keeping Pervez Musharraf in power suddenly paled in comparison to the real threat. As the agencies reopened recent reports, reading them in the light of the newest findings helped in seeing all the pieces fall in place. It was a disastrous lapse on behalf of the multibillion dollar strong organizations. Overnight a report was prepared and the summary was sent to President Pervez Musharraf next morning.

In 1995-96, India came up with a plan to destroy Pakistan’s nuclear facilities before Pakistan developed a nuclear capability. The plan was prepared by a RAW agent Alok Tiwari (who had recently been compromised). At that time Mossad was already active in Pakistan and once it heard about the project for the elimination of Pakistan’s nuclear facilities it jumped in by first tweaking the project and then using its assets in Pakistan. Somewhere in early 1996 the operation was given the go-ahead. At that point FIA Director General Ghulam Asghar and his ADG Rehman Malik in a deal with India and Israel were hunting down Pakistan based Kashmiri and Arab militants. These two men proved to be the front line in the operation and when contacted by Indian agents fully agreed to supply all the necessary information regarding Kahuta and A. Q. Khan’s operations. Towards mid 1996 demonstrations and chaos erupted throughout the country. The aim was to destabilize the country enough that when the two men confirmed to their contacts Pakistan did not have any nuclear capabilities India would go-ahead with all out assault. General Jehangir Karamat who was already wary of the two chaps and Asif Ali Zardari’s complicity took immediate action and Benazir Bhutto’s government was dissolved. The trio of Asghar and Malik and Zardari had already come into military’s radar the year before when they tried to lure General Abdul Wahed Kakar.

Five years later, Alok Tiwari submited an updated version of his older report. Israel was again consulted and this time L. K. Advani vehemently pursued it. Towards the end of 2000 a delegation of top Mossad officials visited India and the combined operation titled Operation Blue Tulsi was finalized and put into operation which had only one aim: Destroy Pakistan’s nuclear assets followed by its Balkanization.

The Approach:

1. Resurrect Baloch insurgency. Pakistan was fine with it, as it had thirty years of experience dealing with it, starting with the Afghan-Soviet War

2. Buy officials in military, bureaucracy, politics and law. ISI was fine with this too, as it had sixty years of experience in dealing with traitors.

3. Plant agents in top positions in Pakistani Taliban, FATA and NWFP. A shocker for everyone.

Taliban were assisted by ISI and the agency had no contingency for enemy agents in top positions in this group. The best option they came up with was to buy back the agents with more money and as a result they were deceived time and again. Top on the list, Baitullah Mehsud. The twenty million dollars he got in suitcases was one of the stupidest moves in the world espionage history and ISI top brass to this day are vengefully pursuing him.

Milestones:

1. Friendly political government. Asif Zardari in place, Aslam Raisani in Balochistan (though first choice Akbar Bugti unfortunately dead, MQM’s omnipresence in Sindh, Fazlur Rehman and ANP in NWFP)

2. Friendly judiciary. Iftikhar Chaudhry, Munir A. Malik, Atizaz Ahsan

3. Friendly secretaries. ??

4. Friendly Civil Society. Ansar Burney, Asma Jehangir

5. Friendly Generals. ??

6. Unrest in NWFP and immediate threat of Taliban taking control of Islamabad. Back in 2002, the US had agreed with India that if ever Pakistan appeared destabilized or falling into the hands of extremists, it would help India in taking out Pakistan’s nuclear capabilities. That moment is embodied in the theme song that the Pakistani media is unfortunately repeating, “Taliban are coming to Islamabad”.

Immediate Countermeasures

By August 2008 the operation was too deep rooted and it was clear if attention was diverted towards saving Musharraf there was more than a probability of losing our nuclear edge through espionage. With Musharraf gone, ISI estimated a window of opportunity of 18 to 20 months before either Taliban or Asif Zardari with his shenanigans destabilized Pakistan. In the greater interest Musharraf decided to step down peacefully.

Operation Blue Tulsi: In Operation

Musharraf stepped down and Asif Ali Zardari took over, but by then the order had been sent and the agents in Swat Valley and FATA who had been preparing for the day for the last eight years launched an all out assault on the military with a single aim of destabilizing Pakistan. In the eventful month of December 2007 Baitullah Mehsud had already announced officially the formation of Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan. Although right after the victory of PPP, Baitullah Mehsud had negotiated peace with the government which led to the great debacle of him receiving US$ 20 million. By August 2008 he was again involved with the military in a full head-on battle. ISI and the military by this time had realized the foremost importance of ridding the Taliban off foreign agents and assets by any means and costs.

At one end Pakistan military still is trying to safeguard its own assets while tracing out and eliminating foreign agents, while at the other end US is trying its best to safeguard its prime asset of Baitullah Meshud who had taken over after the death of Abullah Mehsud. Until very recently, there had been not a single drone attack on Baitullah Mehsud, while ISI aligned Taliban had been bombed repeatedly, as a result of which many have turned their backs against Pakistan. Only in the recent months four drone attacks on Baitullah Mehsud’s territory have been reported.

Operation Blue Tulsi and Future

Currently the entire country is gripped by the ongoing operations of military against the Taliban. The media which once championed itself as the sympathizers of the Taliban and were chanting “Taliban are coming to Islamabad” have suddenly changed their tone, especially after being declared by the Taliban as kafirs and thus “killable”.

The economy is in doldrums and corruption is rampantly high but the top brass knows Pakistan is first and for Pakistan nuclear assets come first. Thus, until the country is cleansed of all the foreign agents in FATA and Taliban, the military and intelligence have only one goal, to stop Operation Blue Tulsi at this stage, making sure it never goes into Phase TWO – attacking and destroying Pakistan’s nuclear assets.

Memory of the Golden Temple Tragedy


By Sajjad Shaukat

June 5 and June 6 are reminders of the ‘Operation Blue Star’ when Indian military, led by General Kuldip Singh Brar, launched attack on the Golden Temple, the holiest shrine of Sikhs in 1984, to arrest Jarnail
Singh Bhindranwale, the only leader who had been boldly fighting for the rights of Sikhs. The Indian Army supported by troops and armoured vehicles broke all records of the state terrorism and extra-judicial killings through that barbaric operation.

It is notable that at that time, there were only 251 Sikhs inside the complex to protect the Golden Temple, resisting well-trained Indian army, equipped with sophisticated weaponry. In those days, majority of the Sikhs were coming to Golden Temple to celebrate Martyr Day of Guru Arjan Dev Ji.

Then the Indian regime used tanks and destroyed the Akaal Takhat Sahib which is right in front of the Golden Temple. On June 6, when all Sikh fighters were martyred along with Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale, Indian troops entered the temple with their shoes by even deliberately ignoring the holiness of the place, showing utter indecency. When the Indian Army felt that only 251 men had prevented them from entering the temple for so many days, they started killing innocent Sikhs who had come there to visit the Temple. The only purpose was to hide their humiliation.

In connection with that incident of state terrorism, Ramnarain Kumar and George Sieberer in their book, The Sikh struggle, write: “The army killed every Sikh who could be found inside the temple complex. They were hauled out of rooms, brought to corridors on the circumference of the temple and with their hands tied behind their back, were shot in cold blood. Among the victims were many old men, women and children.” However, all visitors were locked up in rooms for two days without any food, water, or electricity and were starved to death. Besides, the Golden Temple remained under the army control for many nonths.”

The brutality of the ‘Operation Blue Star’ was not confined to the Golden Temple. Indian armed forces simultaneously attacked 40 other historical gurdwaras all over East Punjab. When Sikhs in other states came to know about the desecration of the Golden Temple and massacre of their brethren, they quickly left for Punjab. New Delhi turned its attention to Sikh military and tried to stop them before they could reach Punjab. Many Sikhs were assassinated on the way and many others were arrested. According to an estimate, about 50,000 Sikhs were killed within a few days. The whole Amritsar city was sealed and was burnt. A number of tourists either were murdered or arrested. Shops belonging to Sikhs were looted and their houses were set ablaze by Hindu mobs. In most of the cases, Sikh women were molested and some persons of their community were also burnt.

Another tragic dimension of the military operation is that historical Sikh artifacts all the literature written by the gurus was taken away by the army and was also set ablaze. In this regard, New Delhi claimed that it was burnt while bombing the Temple.

In November of the same year, two dedicated Sikhs named Beant Singh and Satwant Singh who were posted at Premier Indira Gandhi’s residence in New Delhi, assassinated her. Then Hindu riots erupted in the capital and other cities in which more then 15,000 Sikhs were killed in broad daylight by the supporters of Indira Gandhi while police watched silently so as to provide the Hindus with free hand to massacre Sikhs. The attack on the Golden Temple and genocide of Sikhs only accelerated the liberation movement for Khalistan as Bhindrenwale bacame a folk hero.

Meanwhile, after ‘Operation Blue Star’ and the Sikh genocide, Sikhs’ struggle for independence continued, but the Indian government made every effort to crush the same with the state machinery. To maintain their control over the Golden Temple, another attack was launched on the Temple in 1987, called ‘Operation Black Thunder’. This time only Sikh resistance was the main target. In that respect, quite a number of people of their community were killed and dead bodies lay inside the sacred place for many days. According to a report, many trucks were loaded with dead bodies and all were burned with kerosene oil. Afterwards, ‘Operation Woodrose’ and ‘Operation Black Thunder-II’ were conducted against the Sikh community, which also assassinated them extra-judicially.

After these barbaric operations, Sikhs organised themselves into an armed power in order to fight the Indian state terrorism. Many Sikhs left India to escape religious persecution. Sikhs have spread out all over the world to keep the movement of Khalistan alive. In this respect, their struggle is still going on.

A renowned scholar, Dr. Sangat Singh remarks in his book, The Sikhs in history, “The Indian government has killed over 1 million to 1.2 million Sikhs. During last 18 years Indian government has also killed 50,000 Christians and 100,000 Muslims since 1947. The only way to stop this state terrorism is to create a Khalistan state, where Sikhs and other religious people can enjoy their freedom.”

It is of particular attention that the Indian government dominated by politicians from the Hindi heartland uses force ruthlessly against any move to free Assam, Kashmir, Khalistan, Mizoram, Nagaland, Tamil Nadu and Tripura.

Consequently, ‘Operation Blue Star’ was one of the most inflammatory actions ever taken by the Indian government. Still, coupled with intermittent massacre of Muslims and Christians, including that of the lower caste communities tends to expose the real face of New Delhi. Ground realities display that India is a fundamentalist state under the mask of secularism. And the tragedy of ‘Operation Blue Star’ and its drastic aftermath has, without any doubt, endorsed this fact.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations. Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com

جمعہ، 4 جون، 2010

WAR AGAINST PAKISTANI NUKES

ALI SUKHANVER

In the streets of Pakistan it is very easy to find a lot of youngsters saying, “If war is the last option, we must go for it”. The hatred and disliking for the USA in Pakistan is growing like a wild fire. Most of the people are of the opinion that it is none but the USA behind all the problems the people of Pakistan have been facing for the last many years. Increasing terrorist activities multiplied by all time growing number of drone attacks are undermining the whole social, economic and political set up of Pakistan. People of Pakistan are in such an agony that now they are ready to Do or Die instead of listening to the song Do More, Do More.

Recently a new wave of allegations and blames against Pakistan has appeared on the scene. The story beginning from the Time Square is trying to reach its climax after passing through so many dark and narrow tunnels of distrust and doubts. It seems that the Time Square episode was nothing but a stage, very carefully prepared and designed for giving Pakistan a tough time. USA is no doubt the ‘care taker’ of the whole world around and it has earned this position on the basis of its marvelous abilities in the field of international politics, planning and economic progress. USA has precious brains who always keep on pondering over the tools and implements which can be useful in sustaining its supremacy and domination on the world map. The American media is certainly the most appropriate weapon in this respect. It is something exemplary for the Pakistani media that all newspapers and TV channels in America work as the mouth piece of their government; they say, they write what is in the benefit of their country and their government, keeping in the view the larger interest of their country.

The Washington post of 29th May has reported with reference to senior defense officials ‘Ties between the alleged Times Square bomber, Faisal Shehzad, and elements of the Pakistani Taliban have sharpened the Obama administration's need for retaliatory options, The US is studying options of striking Pakistan if a successful terror attack is traced back to that country. Planning has been reinvigorated in the wake of Times Square.’ According to another defense official US reprisal would be contemplated only under extreme circumstances, such as a catastrophic attack that leaves President Barack Obama convinced that the ongoing campaign of Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) drone strikes is insufficient,” says the Washington Post.

So in the light of the situation revealed by the Washington Post , the people of Pakistan must be prepared for another series of brutal massacre which would not be limited only to the tribal boundaries. This time the American troops would try to step forward to all those areas where they feel the presence of those who are extremist fundamentalist and terrorist, according to the US dictionary of terms. As it has been reported by some other American newspapers, The US options for potential retaliatory action rely mainly on air and missile strikes, but could also employ small teams of US Special Operations troops already positioned along the border with Afghanistan. All these reports are portraying a picture which shows that the US army is going to have no opposition no hurdle and no hindrance while embarking on their voyage to Pakistan. It seems that the American forces

are intending to conquer some wasteland where there is nothing but grains of sand , dried bushes and barren mountains ; the American planners are ignoring some glittering factors which would no doubt prove the worst example of hindrance; the Pakistan Army and the people of Pakistan.

History is the most honest evidence that at every juncture of test and trial, the whole Pakistani nation abruptly joins hand together with the Pakistan Army. Each and every Pakistani becomes a soldier. Just cast a look at the 1965 war between Pakistan and India. The whole nation had turned into an army. The old men, the women, the children, the singers and the poets, all had become the part of the Pakistan army. The US authorities must not ignore the fact that Pakistan is not Iraq; Pakistan is not Afghanistan; this ignorance would prove a fatal crime as well as an irreparable folly if committed.

Pakistan has always been the most sincere supporter and promoter of the US policies in the South Asian region. Without the moral and military support of Pakistan, the USA would never have been able to fight against the menace of terrorism. It is only Pakistan who remained the most important ally of the USA in the war against terror since the very first day. As a result of this support Pakistan had to face very grievous consequences. It had to sacrifice hundreds of it soldiers in the northern tribal areas, its economy had to bear serious setbacks and its innocent people had to face the reaction of the extremists in form of horrible suicidal attacks. But in spite of all these trials and tribulations, Pakistan is now being threatened and frightened. The US authorities must keep in mind what Pakistan has been doing for America for the last many years must not be paid back in form of threatening statements.

USA must keep in mind that Pakistan itself is the worst victim of terrorism. From Karachi to Peshawar the endless series of suicidal attacks in almost all cities of Pakistan, the horrible law and order situation in the tribal areas and so many other heart rending incidents are nothing but blood-drenched examples of terrorism. Pakistan can never have any connection or link to the terrorists. Be it the 9/11 tragedy or the Time Square bomb attempt, Pakistan has nothing to do with any of such activities.

America must not be afraid of the growing terrorism in its own lands because this is nothing unexpected .The Pakistani officials have always been warning the world around that this wave of terrorism can any time travel into other countries if not stopped. But unfortunately no one ever paid any heed to the situation and now this Tsunami of terrorism has started creeping into the American soils. Commenting on the worsening Indo-Pak relationship, the Times of India’s columnist Swami Nathan once very sagely called the US interference in Afghanistan ‘a disastrous mistake’. He said, “India should certainly not make a similar mistake as led the US into disastrous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.” Now the US planners are planning to make this disastrous mistake more grievous by dreaming of dragging Pakistan into the war-zone.

War never plays an affirmative role in the life of a nation. A lot of disaster, an endless loss to the human lives and a mass scale destruction of the whole social fabric; war fruits nothing else. Why seems the US government so keen to wag a war against Pakistan? Is it a sudden reaction to the Time Square episode ; an attempt to cover up the inefficiency of the American law enforcing authorities including the CIA who have failed in keeping an eye on the terrorists grooming and growing in the streets of America or an attempt to deprive Pakistan of its nuclear strength. As far as the people of Pakistan are concerned, they are taking the present hurricane of blames and allegations simply as an attempt of neutralizing Pakistan’s nuclear assets. USA must reconsider its conduct and mind-set if it wants peace in this region. Without a cordial and sympathetic relationship with Pakistan, based on confidence and equality, no type of peace can be guaranteed in the south Asian region.


The writer is a Pakistan based bilingual analyst on defense and strategic affairs. Email: alisukhanver@hotmail.com

جمعرات، 3 جون، 2010

Israeli strike and its impact on Pakistan


Syed Saleem Shahzad

Over the past few years the Palestinian issue, which has seen the rise of the Hamas in Gaza, has in many respects been downgraded from an international conflict into a complex local issue.

Israel’s deadly attack on Monday on an unarmed Turkish aid ship trying to break the Israeli blockade of Gaza has overnight changed this, sparking protest rallies across the Muslim world. Even the biggest facilitator of the Gaza siege, Israel's ally Egypt, reacting to the protests, opened the Rafah border crossing into Gaza.

The incident has also turned the spotlight on the United States, which ultimately might be the major loser, especially in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Hundreds of members of a pro-Iran Islamist group, the Imamia Students' Organisation, marched through the streets of Karachi on Tuesday in protest against the Israeli attack on the Mavi Marmara. The protest was just one of several hundred staged in other parts of the country.

The rally was supposed to take place in front of the Karachi Press Club. As the protesters made their way to the club a group of men suddenly started shouting slogans. These included "La Sharqia La Gharbia Islamiya, Islamiya" (We neither believe in East nor in the West, we only believe in Islam), "Death to America, death to Israel" and "Allies of the Americans and Israel are traitors."

At this point the marchers veered off towards the United States consulate and the protest turned violent as police tried to block the march. At least two dozen student activists were arrested and the remainder dispersed by water cannons.


In Pakistani terms this was a relatively small incident with no deaths, but it is a sign of a fresh anti-American campaign in the country that could easily be replicated in other nations.

The heightened temperature on the streets in Pakistan could not have come at a worse time.

The government is under intense pressure from Washington to launch a massive military offensive in the North Waziristan tribal area, which the US recognises as the crucial base for the Afghan resistance and the global headquarters of al-Qaeda. North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) troops in Afghanistan are also poised for a big offensive against Taliban strongholds in Kandahar province - a move that is highly unpopular with the local population.

Even though Pakistan is termed a most important non-NATO ally in the war in Afghanistan, Islamabad does not have diplomatic relations with Israel. Three Pakistani citizens were on the Mavi Marmara and the incident, including Turkey's unequivocal condemnation of the attack, received widespread media coverage.

International Islamic movements immediately showed up on the streets and formulated plans for demonstrations, including the Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan, which after a high-level meeting in Lahore outlined a prolonged protest campaign.

Former Afghan interim prime minister Ahmad Shah Ahmadzai told Asia Times Online from Kabul that sustained protests could also break out in Afghanistan.

The Kandahar offensive, which was supposed to have been launched before April, is further delayed pending the fate of the operation in North Waziristan, first promised by the Pakistan army last year.

Meanwhile, the Taliban's Operation Fateh (Operation Victory) is on schedule, having begun last month with the attack on a NATO convey in Kabul in which several senior officials were killed, followed by an attack on the massive Bagram air base outside Kabul and one on Kandahar air field.

There have also been pitched battles at Logar air base and deadly assaults in Helmand, Farah and Kuduz. The Taliban captured the only pro-government district of Barge Matal in Nuristan province, including all government buildings. On Tuesday, NATO forces recaptured the district headquarters, but the Taliban still control the mountains and the nearby villages.

The level of the insurgency is expected to increase during the summer months. In short, it is vital for NATO to dismember the Taliban's central command structures - the branch that controls the southeastern Afghan insurgency that is based in North Waziristan, and the southwestern branch based in Kandahar province.

Now, with anti-Israeli and anti-US sentiment at a five-year high, mustering political support behind a pro-American operation in North Waziristan and a Kandahar offensive, already heavily opposed by local tribes, seems impossible. Any delay benefits the Taliban's Operation Fateh - which already has key strategic border towns in Khost, Paktia, Paktika, Kunar and Nangarhar in its sights.

If the offensives do get off the ground, they will certainly stir already inflamed passions and further radicalise youth in Pakistan and Afghanistan - and there is no guarantee of their success.

بدھ، 2 جون، 2010

Robert Fisk: Western leaders are too cowardly to help save lives


When the powerful governments and their puppet rulers failed to condemn Israeli terrorism, it was the civil society and media that have come forward to take initiative. In future patriots will lead humanitarian struggles.

Has Israel lost it? Can the Gaza War of 2008-09 (1,300 dead) and the Lebanon War of 2006 (1,006 dead) and all the other wars and now yesterday's killings mean that the world will no longer accept Israel's rule?

Don't hold your breath.


You only have to read the gutless White House statement – that the Obama administration was "working to understand the circumstances surrounding the tragedy". Not a single word of condemnation. And that's it. Nine dead. Just another statistic to add to the Middle East's toll.

But it's not.

In 1948, our politicians – the Americans and the British – staged an airlift into Berlin. A starving population (our enemies only three years before) were surrounded by a brutal army, the Russians, who had erected a fence around the city. The Berlin airlift was one of the great moments in the Cold War. Our soldiers and our airmen risked and gave their lives for these starving Germans.

Incredible, isn't it? In those days, our politicians took decisions; our leaders took decisions to save lives. Messrs Attlee and Truman knew that Berlin was important in moral and human as well as political terms.

And today? It was people – ordinary people, Europeans, Americans, Holocaust survivors – yes, for heaven's sake, survivors of the Nazis – who took the decision to go to Gaza because their politicians and their statesmen had failed them.

Where were our politicians yesterday? Well, we had the ridiculous Ban Ki-moon, the White House's pathetic statement, and dear Mr Blair's expression of "deep regret and shock at the tragic loss of life". Where was Mr Cameron? Where was Mr Clegg?

Back in 1948, they would have ignored the Palestinians, of course. It is, after all, a terrible irony that the Berlin airlift coincided with the destruction of Arab Palestine.

But it is a fact that it is ordinary people, activists, call them what you will, who now take decisions to change events. Our politicians are too spineless, too cowardly, to take decisions to save lives. Why is this? Why didn't we hear courageous words from Messrs Cameron and Clegg yesterday?

For it is a fact, is it not, that had Europeans (and yes, the Turks are Europeans, are they not?) been gunned down by any other Middle Eastern army (which the Israeli army is, is it not?) there would have been waves of outrage.

And what does this say about Israel? Isn't Turkey a close ally of Israel? Is this what the Turks can expect? Now Israel's only ally in the Muslim world is saying this is a massacre – and Israel doesn't seem to care.

But then Israel didn't care when London and Canberra expelled Israeli diplomats after British and Australian passports were forged and then provided to the assassins of Hamas commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh. It didn't care when it announced new Jewish settlements on occupied land in East Jerusalem while Joe Biden, the Vice-President of its erstwhile ally, the United States, was in town. Why should Israel care now?

How did we get to this point? Maybe because we all grew used to seeing the Israelis kill Arabs, maybe the Israelis grew used to killing Arabs. Now they kill Turks. Or Europeans. Something has changed in the Middle East these past 24 hours – and the Israelis (given their extraordinarily stupid political response to the slaughter) don't seem to have grasped what has happened. The world is tired of these outrages. Only the politicians are silent.

Diplomatic storms

*Goldstone report, November 2009

Israel launched Operation Cast Lead in December 2008 with the declared aim of halting rocket fire from Gaza into Israel. More than 1,400 Palestinians were killed in the three-week conflict along with 13 Israelis. The South African jurist Richard Goldstone's report into the conflict found both Israel and the Hamas movement that controls the Strip guilty of war crimes, but focused more on Israel. Israel refused to co-operate with Goldstone and described his report as distorted and biased.

* The al-Mabhouh assassination, January-May 2010

Britain and Australia expelled Israeli diplomats after concluding that Israel had forged British and Australian passports used by assassins to kill a Hamas commander in Dubai. Israel has neither confirmed or denied a role in the killing of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in his hotel room in January. Britain said such misuse of British passports was "intolerable". Australia said it was not the behaviour of "a nation with whom we have had such a close, friendly and supportive relationship".

*Settlements row, March 2010

Israel announces plans, during visit by US Vice-President Joe Biden, to build 1,600 homes for Jews in an area of the West Bank annexed by Israel. The announcement triggers unusually harsh criticism from the United States. Washington said it damaged its efforts to revive the Middle East peace process. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the project was an insult. Netanyahu said he was blindsided by planning bureaucrats and apologised to Biden. Today's meeting with Barack Obama at the White House, called off by Mr Netanyahu so he could return home to deal with the flotilla crisis, was supposed to be another part of the fence-mending between the two allies.

*Nuclear secrecy, May 2010

Israel, widely assumed to have the Middle East's only nuclear arsenal, has faced renewed calls to sign a global treaty barring the spread of atomic weapons. Signatories of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) last week called for a conference in 2012 to discuss banning weapons of mass destruction throughout the Middle East. The declaration was adopted by all 189 parties to the NPT, including the US. It urged Israel to sign the NPT and put its nuclear facilities under UN safeguards.

Bleeding Lahore

Story

Pakistanis Detained In Israel Likely To Reach Home Today


Three Pakistanis, detained by Israel after attack on aid flotilla, have been deported to Jordan by the Israeli authorities, and according to the latest updates they have reached Jordan.

Interior Minister Rehman Malik informed that the detained Pakistanis would reach Pakistan today.

Malik said that the three Pakistani’s have been handed over to Jordanian ambassador to Israel. He added that special arrangements have been made to bring back prominent journalist Talat Hussain and his two companions.

It is pertinent to mention that the three Pakistani’s were held in captivity after Israeli forces stormed Gaza-bound aid flotilla.

Talat Hussain & Producer Raza Agha Senior Journalist (Pakistan) missing’ Talat Hussain is married to Tehmina Talat and has 2 kids, a boy Shamil and a girl Afza. He lives in Islamabad. A team of AAJ News, a Pakistani news channel, lead by Executive Director News and Current Affairs Talat Hussain, was on board one of the six ships of the Freedom Fotilla. No contact has been established with any of the journalists.

The Aid Flotilla has been attacked in International Waters in clear violation of all UN rules. The whole world has condemned it but Israel has rarely listened to such international condemnations.

The reports came just after daybreak, with the vessel still well away from the Gaza shore. Israel had earlier declared it would not allow the ships to reach Gaza.


منگل، 1 جون، 2010

Maoists controlling Indian

Looks like it is Maoists controlling Indian law and order now a day instead of Indian authorities!!
Maoist leader promises 'security' for Indian trains
A Maoist leader in India has said that they will take "full responsibility" for the safety of trains travelling through areas under their control.












A Maoist leader in India has said that they will take "full responsibility" for the safety of trains travelling through areas under their control.

Comrade Akaash's statement comes after the rebels were blamed for Friday's train crash which left 148 people dead.

Police say Maoist rebels sabotaged the track, causing the derailment of the Calcutta-Mumbai express in West Bengal.


Maoists denied the charge. But Comrade Akaash also said they would investigate whether any rebels were involved.

Railway officials in eastern India have cancelled night trains in Maoist-affected areas after Friday's incident.

'Definite evidence' Comrade Akaash told the BBC that they were "appealing" to the railways to run trains through rebel strongholds even during the night.

"We are promising total security to all trains. We will not allow anyone to attack any train anywhere in the country and those trying to do it will face stern punishment," he said.

The railways have not reacted to the statement.

Police say they have "definite evidence" that a local rebel Maoist militia were behind the disaster - they have named two militia leaders as the prime suspects.

One of the suspects, Umakanta Mahato, was arrested last June and charged with sedition and waging war against the state.

But he was released on bail in December, and the police did not contest the bail, court records say.


Independent lawyers are asking why the police did not contest the bail plea of a senior Maoist militia leader.

Railway officials in eastern India have cancelled night trains in Maoist-affected areas after Friday's incident.

The restrictions would be in place until 0500 [2330GMT] on 3 June, the company said.

Report said other services were being rescheduled to ensure they travelled through Maoist areas of eastern India in daylight.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has described the Maoist insurgency as India's biggest internal security challenge.

Zionist regime state-sponsored terrorism

By Gul Jammas Hussain

On Monday, Israel added another shameful chapter to its long history of blatant disregard of international law and the Geneva Conventions when its navy and air force attacked the Gaza-bound Freedom Flotilla in international waters, killing 19 international activists and wounding dozens of others.

In a wanton act of state-sponsored terrorism, Israeli warships encircled the aid ships, 150 kilometers outside of its territorial waters, and Israeli gunship helicopters dropped commandos onto the ships, who then began shooting the people on board without giving any prior warning.

The Free Gaza Movement website reported that the Israeli commandos were dropped from a helicopter onto the Turkish passenger ship Mavi Marmara and began to shoot the moment their feet hit the deck.

Live footage taken from the Turkish passenger ship, which was posted all over the Internet, showed black-clad Israeli commandos rappelling down from helicopters and clashing with activists, as well as several wounded people lying on the deck of the ship.

The flotilla of six small and medium-sized boats was on its way to deliver and distribute food items, medicines, electric generators, building materials, and children’s toys to the Gaza Strip, which has been under a relentless Israeli blockade since the Islamic resistance movement Hamas took control of the coastal territory in June 2007.

In that freest and fairest election ever held in the Arab world, the people of Palestine delivered Hamas a phenomenal mandate of 74 of the 132 seats in the Palestinian Legislative Council against Al-Fatah's 46. Out of 1.3 million eligible voters, 77.7 percent thronged the polling stations in Hebron, Nablus, North Gaza, Tulkarm, Jenin, Gaza City, Bethlehem, and throughout the occupied territories to express their opinion. However, instead of appreciating such a spectacle of democracy, in which the Palestinians showed a superb sense of political consciousness in bringing Hamas to power, the hypocritical Western powers, led by the United States, denounced the Islamic resistance movement and launched a dehumanization campaign against high-ranking Hamas officials, which provided an opportunity for the Zionist regime to impose a crippling siege over the ever-suffering people of Gaza.

However, Israel’s latest atrocity even shocked and outraged its closet allies like the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Austria, Germany, Belgium, and the European Union, which all condemned Israel’s assault on civilians in the Mediterranean Sea.

The United Nations, the Arab League, Iran, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Pakistan also condemned Israel’s crime against a humanitarian mission.

However, all this did not shame the Zionist regime.

Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon blamed the victim -- in typical Zionist fashion -- saying the activists themselves were responsible for the massacre and branding them allies of international terrorist organizations.

Had they got through, Ayalon said, they would have opened an arms smuggling route to Gaza.

Adding insult to injury, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak insisted that there is no hunger and no humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The whole flotilla operation, he said, was “a political and media provocation by anti-Israeli organizations.”

Since 2008, the Free Gaza Movement and a coalition of human rights activists and pro-Palestinian groups have been sending boats and landing or attempting to land supplies to break the blockade of Gaza, including medical equipment and drugs and building materials.

This time the flotilla, the largest to date, carrying over 600 passengers -- believed to include the Swedish author Henning Mankell and the Irish Nobel laureate Mairead Corrigan-Maguire -- was organized by pro-Gaza groups in Greece and Sweden, the Malaysian-based Perdana Global Peace Organization, and the Turkish-based foundation for Human Rights and Freedom and Humanitarian Relief (IHH), all coordinated by the Free Gaza Movement.

After this incident, the world should realize it should stop kowtowing to Israel and should inform Tel Aviv that it can no longer flout international law.

All countries should send Israeli ambassadors packing and should call on the International Criminal Court to try the Israeli officials responsible for ordering the murder of unarmed civilians in an act of unprovoked aggression on the open sea.

And the international community should organize an enormous flotilla of aid ships from all over world and send it to break the siege of Gaza.

The Zionist regime understood the importance of this grand mission, and thus tried to instill fear in the hearts of the people of the Middle East with the massacre of unarmed civilians. But Israel’s bloody interception of the Gaza aid flotilla will highlight the continuing blockade of the Gaza Strip in the most dramatic way possible and will certainly increase the pressure to lift the siege.

So the blood of the men and women who sacrificed their lives on Monday for the cause of Palestine will not have been spilt in vain and will usher in a new era of hope for the oppressed people of Palestine.


India’s Helplessness before Maoist Insurgency

By Sajjad Shaukat

Failed in coping with the Maoist insurgency, new operations of the Indian security forces have exposed the helplessness of India. In this regard, on May 18 this year, Home Minister P. Chidamabram said that the Indian government “welcomes peace talks with Maoist rebels.” On the other side, the CNN-IBN news channel quoted Ramanna, a Maoist leader in Chhattisgarh state, as saying over the phone that the government should first withdraw thousands of paramilitary soldiers, deployed to fight the rebels and create peaceful conditions for talks.

However, peace talks have been offered by the New Delhi after the Maoist insurgents ambushed a bus on May 17 that killed 45 police officers and civilians who were returning after an operation, killing two Maoists. The event has highlighted the Maoists’ strength despite a government offensive aimed at ending one of Asia’s longest militancy.

Besides, on May 26, Maoist militants sabotaged a high-speed train in eastern India, killing at least 65 people after it smashed into the path of a goods train.

In fact, Maoist uprising which has taken the form of armed struggle is indigenous. It has become an unending insurgency due to the injustices and state terrorism perpetrated by the rich Hindus and Indian security forces.

Maoist movement initially started by its leader, Mupala Luxman Rao in 1969 in the form of peasant uprising in West Bengal, protesting against big Hindu landlords who left no stone unturned in molesting the poor people through their mal-treatment such as forced labour, minimum wages, maximum work, unlawful torture and even killings�the evils one could note prior to the Frech Revolution of 1789 when fedual lords had practised similar injustices on the farmers.

However, instead of redressing the grievances of the peasants and workers, Indian security forces in connivance with the rich-dominated society used the forces of state terrorism in crushing the Maoist movement. The Maoists had no choice, but to launch an armed struggle for their genuine rights.

The Naxalite-Maoists, as they call themselves, are the liberators, representing landless farmers and the downtrodden masses who have been entangled into vicious circle of poverty, misery and deprivation. The Indian indiscriminate social order treats them resentfully, setting aside human dignity and self-respect. It is owing to the continued inequalities that Maoists have appealed to the sentments of the helpless poor, who found their future dark under the susequent regimes led by so-called democratic forces of India. According to a report, “Out of total 1.17 billion populations, over 39% of dispossessed Indians, living below poverty line are hopeful that Maoists would bring a change in their wretched lives.”

Ideologically, the Naxalites are against the current Indian state. They believe that Indians have yet need freedom from hunger and deprivation, and from the exploitation of the poor by the rich classes of landlords, industrialists and traders who control the means of production. Due to these reasons, Maoists target all representatives of the state like politicians, the police and other officials. At local level, they target village functionaries and landlords.

Having its voice unheard, Maoist movement which had been raging in West Bengal, Bihar, Orissa, Jharkand, Chattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh, has expanded to Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Kerala. Now, it is a popular movement which has massive support of people for its ideology.

In the recent months, Maoist insurgency has intensified enveloping new areas. An Indian government assessment admits that the Naxalite influence has extended over a third of the country.

Notably, Maoist movement has become a violent struggle because of the use of undue force by the Indian security forces. In this regard, on October 31, 2009, The New York Times wrote, “India’s Maoist rebels are now present in 20 states and have evolved into a potent insurgency. In the last four years, the Maoists have killed more than 900 Indian security officers…violence erupts almost daily.” The Times explained, “If the Maoists were once dismissed as a ragtag band of outdated ideologies, Indian leaders are now preparing to deploy nearly 70,000 paramilitary officers for a prolonged counterinsurgency campaign to hunt down the guerrillas in some of the country’s most rugged terrain…the Maoists represent the dispossessed of Indian society, particularly the indigenous tribal groups, who suffer some of the country’s highest rates of poverty, illiteracy and infant mortality…India’s rapid economic growth has made it an emerging global power but also deepened stark inequalities in society. Maoists accuse the government of trying to push tribal groups off their land to gain access to raw materials and have sabotaged roads, bridges and even an energy pipeline.”

BBC had reported on October 12, 2009, “In response to the atrocities of the Indian police, Maoist rebels had blown up culverts and cut electricity to railways in various regions during two-day strike.”

Naxalite insurgency known as Red Corridor has become so popular that India is actively considering shifting 23 battalions of para-military forces from occupied Kashmir to the Maoist affected areas.

Surprisingly, in the recent past, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh admitted in a meeting of police chiefs saying: “his country is losing the battle against Maoist rebels…violence is increasing” and “Maoists have growing appeal among a large section of Indian society including tribal communities, the rural poor and the intelligentsia.”


While on the one hand, Indian rulers realise the real causes of Maoist uprising, but still accuse China of backing the Maoist guerrilla warfare. They have started a series of allegaion against Beijing in this connection. Some Indian high officials misperceive that China supplies armes and ammuniton to Maoists in neighbouring Nepal where Chinese command strong influence. According to some recent Indian accusation, New Delhi believe that Nepali Maoists and Indian Maoists have formed a nexus duly supported by Beijing. With the covert support of Indian secret agency, RAW, Indians also propagate that there are secret training camps in China, which teach tactics of guerrilla warfare to the Maoists, and then they are being despatched to India.

There is no doubt that Maoists of India are fighting for the basic rights of lower and middle classes, which have been usurped by the upper classes supported by the Indian government. Just as we have noted in case of some other states of India, especially in the occupied Kashmir where struggle of liberation continues in one or the other way�when people take to arms, there is going to be all kinds of violence by the freedom fighters and the revolutionaries. So Indian so-called democratic system is responsible for the drastic situation it has created.

Moreover, Maoist guerrilla commanders have been providing basic military training to local youths in West Bengal. They use weapons which they have snatched from the installations of Indian security forces. Since their struggle, they have kidnapped a number of personnel of the armed forces. Some poor persons, serving in the Indian forces have also provided them with arms and ammunition.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations. Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com