A pistol packin private American security contractor on a motorcycle kills two Pakistani civilians allegedly attempting to rob him. Another Pakistani is killed when a US diplomat from the nearby consulate in Lahore, rushing to the rescue, goes the wrong way down a one-way road. This debacle is the new symbol of a hated US presence that feeds the propaganda mills of the growing Islamist forces in Pakistan.
By Harlan Ullman
The US, at all levels of government, immediately claimed diplomatic immunity for Mr Davis. Problems started and the crisis escalated, reflecting the huge divide between the two strategic partners and the vast anti-American hostility sadly shared by a great majority of Pakistanis.
Two ticking packages have slipped into the White House. One is the situation in Egypt that, if not handled carefully, especially in Cairo as well as in Washington, could be the bomb that explodes in the Middle East. The other package is IED-like — an improvised explosive device lurking in Lahore. If that goes off, the US-Pakistani relationship will be irreversibly damaged.
The massive protests in Egypt have captured worldwide attention. The many tens of thousands of Egyptians gathering in and around Tahrir Square, demanding that Mubarak must go, is indeed a real revolution. But the consequences of these protests both for the here and now and for the long-term cannot even be guessed.
Pakistan is quite opposite from Egypt in that the pending crisis revolves around a single individual, not tens of thousands of Pakistanis. Yet, these consequences could prove as disastrous for the US and Pakistan as could uncontrollable events in Egypt. Thus far, swamped by media fixation on Egypt, the arrest of an American diplomat in Lahore two weeks ago on charges of killing two Pakistanis along with possessing an illegal weapon has not become a cause celebre in the US just yet.
What is happening and could happen in Egypt has predictably provoked incessant commentary and opinion. For the moment, events seem to be unfolding in a positive direction because of discussions on forming a transition government now including members of the opposition and the intention of ending emergency rule. However, fragility reigns. A single spark could ignite this political bombshell.
The Pakistani IED is different. Two weeks ago, an American named Raymond Davis was arrested in Lahore for the shooting of two Pakistanis. Davis claimed the two attempted to hold him up at gunpoint and that he acted in self-defence. A third Pakistani was also killed when a backup car from the US consulate reportedly rushed to Davis’ aid and hit a civilian motorcyclist.
The US, at all levels of government, immediately claimed diplomatic immunity for Mr Davis, demanding his immediate release and unequivocally supported his claim of self-defence. Then, problems started and the crisis escalated, reflecting the huge divide between the two strategic partners and the vast anti-American hostility sadly shared by a great majority of Pakistanis.
As an accredited diplomat, the Vienna Convention of 1961 guarantees Mr Davis immunity. From the US and international law perspectives, the case is ironclad and there have been numerous egregious examples where diplomats have been protected by immunity. Unfortunately, technicalities in procedure and in Pakistani law have kept Davis in custody. It appears that Pakistan did not draft the Vienna Convention into their law. And the US may not have listed Davis as immunised in documentation to the Pakistani foreign ministry.
But the explosive forces in this IED are not these legal technicalities. They are the politics of Pakistan. Punjab is the power base for the PML-N, the leading opposition to the ruling PPP with Lahore being its headquarters. The police technically come under the province. Both the provincial and federal courts are fiercely independent of the federal government.
Pakistanis are enraged over this incident and the killing of a third person after which the driver allegedly escaped into the sanctuary of the consulate. Worse, the widow of one of the victims just committed suicide. Any Pakistani government official who intervenes on behalf of Davis will attract public ire and possible retaliation. The recent assassination of Punjab Governor Salmaan Taseer for taking a strong stand against the blasphemy laws has not been forgotten.
One of the many fuses to this IED is the Pakistani media, filled with all sorts of ludicrous conspiracy theories accusing Davis of being everything from James Bond to Machine Gun Kelly. The US has its ‘birther’ stories about President Barack Obama being foreign born. The Pakistani media is far more irresponsible. For example, one of the major papers in the country has repeatedly reported President Asif Ali Zardari’s secret marriage to a Pakistani-American doctor. The story has been denied by the lady who has never even met the president. The story has also provided the grounds for a suit filed against the publisher by an attorney acting for Mr Zardari.
The White House is understandably playing hardball over this. The bilateral meeting between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Pakistan Foreign Minister S M Qureshi was cancelled and Zardari’s state visit could hang in the balance. The already strained relationship will deteriorate further.
The White House knows that only the Egyptians can defuse their bomb and Pakistanis their IED over the detention of Mr Davis. For the former, that will take a very long time. A new government and the emergence of new political parties as well as repairing the economy will all take time. In the latter crisis, Pakistani politics are the inhibitors.
But make no mistake; unless both bombs are defused, the damage will be incalculable.
The writer is Chairman of the Killowen Group that advises leaders of government and business, and Senior Advisor at Washington DC’s Atlantic Council