While one is at a loss for words to condemn the massacre of over 100 people in Norway by Anders Behring Breivik, the incident is a grim reminder that terrorism has no boundaries or religion for that matter and that indeed the western world by badmouthing Muslims everywhere around the globe was only deceiving its gullible public to achieve ulterior motives.
 |
| Anders Behring Breivik |
Hair-raising details are coming to surface about real background and
motives of the Norwegian mass murderer, who killed 93 people in Oslo in
twin attacks — a bomb blast and firing on a summer camp of the ruling
party. According to the latest reports, the deeds of the killer were
part of a deep-rooted conspiracy being hatched by some anti-Islam groups
to malign Muslims and create conditions that could provide
justification for military action against them.
It is shocking to know that the man was not just a Christian fanatic but
had been working in coordination with several dozen other anti-Muslim
individuals and groups in the United States, Israel, Britain, France,
Germany, Belgium and India. He was also working on a plot to attack
nuclear power stations and put the blame on Muslims in a secret campaign
to banish Muslims from Europe. It was bad luck of the masterminds that
the killer not only survived but was also arrested and their nefarious
designs to put the blame on Muslims were foiled. These chilling and
stunning details make it quite obvious that the network and activities
of the groups which the killer represented were no less than that of
Al-Qaeda and the man himself was as dangerous as Osama bin Laden. But it
is intriguing and regrettable that the Western media, which misses no
opportunity of Muslim bashing, has adopted a mysterious silence and is
not as enthusiast as it should have been in digging out the truth; just
because the man is their brother in faith and the term ‘terrorist’ is
only reserved for Muslims. Otherwise, we need an Abbottabad-like
operation to strike at the roots of such groups and individuals, who are
in abundance in Europe as well as in India.
Also it is an unfortunate reality that America’s unjust war on terror
has bred hatred within the Muslim community on the one hand and has
increased prejudice of Muslim in the West, on the other; Breivik
provides a glaring example of it. In fact such an outburst of hatred of
Muslims was bound to happen given the US propaganda machinery busy
demonising Muslims day in and day out. It is, therefore, understandable
why the attack had so much shocked Europe and the US. Breivik is no
lunatic, as is manifest from his statement that the action was
“atrocious but necessary”. He thought it necessary because he wanted to
prevent the Western Europe from “Muslim takeover” and therefore attacked
“Islamic colonisation”. His words that he wanted to bring about a
revolution are noteworthy because they reek of the same hatred that
President Bush had nurtured evident by the term “crusade” he used.
Breivik also revealed that a network of more terrorist cells exist and
so the police, who up until the incident were busy keeping an eye on the
Muslim Diaspora, should get alert.
کوئی تبصرے نہیں:
ایک تبصرہ شائع کریں