Sometime before 1775, American Founding
Father, Benjamin Franklin wrote: “They that can give up essential
liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor
safety.”
_________________________________________________________
Across much of the West, after September 11, 2001, we have indeed given
up our essential liberty, and more over, our dignity in exchange for the
illusion of safety. Our streets and public events are filled with
militarized police and very literally soldiers wielding machine guns and
riding around in armored vehicles. And yet with this militarized
security, invasive Constitution-violating searches, warrantless
wiretaps, humiliating pat-downs by federal security at airports,
terrorist bombs still managed to rip through the streets of Boston
killing 3 and injuring many more.
There is nothing more symbolic of the fall of America as a free people
than scenes of impotent militarized police standing around aimlessly
with their immense arsenal cradled in their idle hands in the wake of an
attack their presence did nothing to prevent. What's more, is their
presence after the attack was likewise useless, their weapons and armor
incapable of doing anything to help the scores of injured.
We have given up our liberty and our dignity in order to obtain a little
temporary safety - and predictably we have neither liberty nor safety.
The FBI and the Illusion of Terror
Disturbing is the habit of the FBI's posing as terrorists with ties
to Al Qaeda, approaching patsies who they then provide explosives and
other weapons to, and help engineer an attack which they then "foil" to
make spectacular headlines. Many times real explosives are
test-detonated with suspects, before inert devices are switched in for
the final attack.
In one case in Portland Oregon in 2010, a van was actually
parked next to a crowded Christmas tree lighting ceremony where the
FBI-entrapped suspect attempted and failed to detonate an FBI-provided
inert bomb.
More astounding was the fact that the FBI had actually brought
this same entrapped suspect earlier to a location in Lincoln County,
Oregon, where real explosives were in fact detonated. The FBI's official
statement titled, "Oregon Resident Arrested in Plot to Bomb Christmas
Tree Lighting Ceremony in Portland," released by the U.S. Attorney’s
Office on November 26, 2010 stated (emphasis added):
According to the affidavit, on November 4, 2010, Mohammad and
the undercover FBI operatives traveled to a remote location in Lincoln
County, Ore., where they detonated a bomb concealed in a backpack as a
trial run for the upcoming attack. Afterwards, on the drive back to
Corvallis, undercover FBI operatives questioned Mohammad as to whether
he was capable of looking at the bodies of those who would be killed in
the upcoming attack in Portland. According to the affidavit, Mohammad
responded, “I want whoever is attending that event to leave, to leave
either dead or injured.”
More frightening still was the apparent motivation behind the FBI's uncover operation.
In 2005, Portland became the first city in the United States to
withdraw from the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force, (JTTF) over concerns
it would threaten civil liberties. The FBI, unwelcomed in Portland,
decided to then approach a dupe, entrap him, and spectacularly "foil" a
high profile terror plot of their own design during Portland's annual
Christmas tree lighting ceremony - without notifying the local
government or local law enforcement of the ongoing operation.
The operation would humiliate local representatives and in
particular, Mayor Sam Adams, making them appear negligent, incompetent,
and impotent. And, in the wake of the operation, citing the FBI's
charade specifically, Portland would eventually agree to rejoin the
JTTF.
What, if not terrorism, would such events be classified as? The
FBI's JTTF was ousted from Portland, and it subsequently used the
threat of violence to coerce the city into accepting it back. It was an
operation A-Z engineered by the FBI with a specific political motivation
lurking just beneath the surface.
The opaque, covert nature of these operations should also
profoundly disturb readers. The FBI apparently has access to vast
resources to conduct these operations, including weapons, real
explosives, vehicles, and just about everything else most likely used in
the Boston blasts. According to the New York Times, in their article,
"Portland, Ore., Votes to Rejoin Task Force After Terrorism Scare:"
The investigation had been under way for many months, but the
Portland police were consulted only near the end, largely to help with
logistics of a sting operation. Mayor Sam Adams was unaware until after
the arrest.
Who then is overseeing these operations outside of the
FBI? These are operations where real explosives are even detonated ...
and in the case of the World Trade Center bombing in 1993, FBI monitored
suspects actually went through with the final attack, killing 6, and
wounding many more (The New York Times, "Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart
Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast").
The answer is, no one is overseeing them, and they are kept
secret until the FBI either "foils" them for political points, or a
witness steps forward and reveals the FBI's role in successful attacks
that maim or kill innocent people.
This constitutes a very real terror threat to America, but one
that lurks within Washington and in our cities' local FBI offices,
carried out by men in suits and ties, not cave-dwelling extremists in
Afghanistan or "homegrown terrorists." For the people of Boston, one of
the first targets for investigation should in fact be, the local FBI
office.
Monsters of Our Own Creation/Perpetuation
And while America's domestic threat is one contrived and perpetuated
primarily by the very people charged with defending the nation against
terrorism, real foreign extremists do exist. It should surprise no one
however, considering what the FBI does at home, who is minding this
terrorist network abroad.
It is now believed that pressure cooker improvised explosive
devices were used in the blasts - devices frequently used overseas by Al
Qaeda's many various incarnations. Should "Al Qaeda" turn out to be
behind the Boston blasts, readers would benefit from understanding just
what exactly "Al Qaeda" is.
CBS News in their report titled, "Homeland Security warned about pressure cooker bombs," stated:
U.S. authorities warned as far back as nine years ago that
terrorists could use metal pressure cookers to cause deadly carnage.
The common kitchen cooking implement - found in countless American homes
- has emerged as a key component in the horrific bombings that killed
three people and injured more than 170 at the Boston Marathon yesterday.
In 2004 a memo titled "Potential terrorist use of pressure
cookers" alerted border inspectors, agents, law enforcement officers and
other first-responders that the seemingly-innocuous items could be used
to create improvised explosive devices (IEDs).
The memo says the bomb-making technique is commonly taught
in Afghan terrorist training camps - and had already led to bombing
casualties.
The article would also mention terrorists operating in Algeria
using rigged pressure cooker devices to carry out attacks - militants
long associated not only with Al Qaeda directly, but neighboring Libyan
terrorist organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) which
was recently handed the nation of Libya by NATO.
This would also be the same Al Qaeda that the US and NATO are
in the process of arming and funding in Syria for the past 2 years.
Likewise, it is the same Al Qaeda spawned from the sectarian
crypto-terror organization, the Muslim Brotherhood, helped into power on
the back of region-wide US-engineered political destabilization, and
funded to the tune of billions by America's allies in Riyadh and Doha.
In fact, for the past 30 years, the US, Saudi Arabia, and other
regional allies including Israel have cultivated, armed, funded, and
expanded Al Qaeda, using them as both a casus belli for military
intervention and a global mercenary force everywhere from Libya to
Bosnia, Iraq to Iran, Afghanistan, and of course across Syria for the
past two years.
And even as the Boston blasts appear to be shaping up as the
work of sectarian extremists affiliated with this vast network of
US-Saudi sponsored terror, US ally Qatar is defending its aid given to
terrorists operating across Syria. Reuters reported in their article,
"Qatar says aid for Syria rebels and Islamists won’t harm region," that:
Qatar on Tuesday rejected criticism that it risked
destabilizing the Middle East by supporting rebels in Syria or the
Muslim Brotherhood and said it was helping people but did not interfere
in governments.
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has accused Arab states
who are arming and sheltering rebel fighters of actions that could
“create a domino effect throughout the Middle East and beyond,” with
Saudi Arabia and Qatar clearly in mind.
Qatar had armed, funded, and even provided air support and troops
to Al Qaeda in Libya during their successful bid to overthrow the
government and take power in Tripoli. The Guardian reported in their
article, "Qatar admits sending hundreds of troops to support Libya
rebels," that:
Qatar has admitted for the first time that it sent hundreds
of troops to support the Libyan rebels who overthrew Muammar Gaddafi's
regime.
The [Persian] Gulf state had previously acknowledged only that its air force took part in NATO-led attacks.
So clearly, Qatar is in the business of interfering with governments, and using Al Qaeda militants to do so.
Similarly, Qatar, along with Saudi Arabia, the US, Turkey,
Israel and other allies, have been funneling cash and thousands of tons
of weapons into Syria - all of which have ended up in the hands of Al
Qaeda's Syrian franchise, Jabhat al-Nusra.
The New York Times in their article titled, "Arms Airlift to Syria Rebels Expands, With C.I.A. Aid," admits that:
With help from the C.I.A., Arab governments and Turkey have
sharply increased their military aid to Syria’s opposition fighters in
recent months, expanding a secret airlift of arms and equipment for the
uprising against President Bashar al-Assad, according to air traffic
data, interviews with officials in several countries and the accounts of
rebel commanders.
The airlift, which began on a small scale in early 2012
and continued intermittently through last fall, expanded into a steady
and much heavier flow late last year, the data shows. It has grown to
include more than 160 military cargo flights by Jordanian, Saudi and
Qatari military-style cargo planes landing at Esenboga Airport near
Ankara, and, to a lesser degree, at other Turkish and Jordanian
airports.
While the West attempts to claim these weapons are being sent
to "moderates," the US itself admits that Al Qaeda is operating in every
major city in Syria and is by far the most highly organized, most
prominent militant front in the conflict. If the West via Saudi Arabia
and Qatar is sending thousands of tons of weapons to "moderates," who is
sending more weapons to Jabhat al-Nusra?
The obvious answer is there are no moderates, and the West has been
intentionally arming Al Qaeda from the beginning. In fact, this is a
documented conspiracy first revealed as early as 2007 by Pulitzer
Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh in his New Yorker article titled,
""The Redirection: Is the Administration’s new policy benefiting our
enemies in the war on terrorism?" which stated specifically:
To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush
Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in
the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has cooperated with
Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations
that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is
backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations
aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has
been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant
vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda.
Further evidence that the summation of US aid has fallen into
the hands of Al Qaeda in Syria, comes to us from Washington Post
propagandist Liz Sly who reported in her article, "U.S. feeds Syrians,
but secretly," that:
In the heart of rebel-held territory in Syria’s northern
province of Aleppo, a small group of intrepid Westerners is undertaking a
mission of great stealth. Living anonymously in a small rural
community, they travel daily in unmarked cars, braving airstrikes,
shelling and the threat of kidnapping to deliver food and other aid to
needy Syrians - all of it paid for by the U.S. government.
Sly then claims that most Syrians credit Al Qaeda's al-Nusra with providing the aid:
“America has done nothing for us. Nothing at all,” said
Mohammed Fouad Waisi, 50, spitting out the words for emphasis in his
small Aleppo grocery store, which adjoins a bakery where he buys bread
every day. The bakery is fully supplied with flour paid for by the
United States. But Waisi credited Jabhat al-Nusra - a rebel group the
United States has designated a terrorist organization because of its
ties to al-Qaeda - with providing flour to the region, though he
admitted he wasn’t sure where it comes from.
And while Sly attempts to spin the story as merely misdirected
anger and ignorance on the part of Syrians receiving the aid, it is well
documented that bakeries in terrorist-held territory are manned by Al
Qaeda militants. In fact, while Sly maintains that "security concerns"
are owed for America's opaque aid distribution, it appears more likely
the US is attempting to insidiously obfuscate its use of humanitarian
aid to help its militant proxies win "hearts and minds" amid a
humanitarian catastrophe the West itself engineered and perpetuated
intentionally.
The London Telegraph reported in their article, "Syria: how
jihadist group Jabhat al-Nusra is taking over Syria's revolution," that
taking over bakeries was a key strategy used by Al Qaeda's al-Nusra
front to "win over" the population:
Then, in the past weeks, Jabhat al-Nusra - which is outside
the FSA - pushed other rebel groups out of the stores and established a
system to distribute bread throughout rebel areas.
In a small office attached to a bakery in the Miesseh district of
Aleppo, Abu Yayha studied a map pinned on the wall. Numbers were
scrawled in pencil against streets.
“We counted the population of every street to assess the need
for the area,” explained Mr Yahya. “We provide 23,593 bags of bread
every two days for this area. This is just in one district. We are
calculating the population in other districts and doing the same there.
“In shops the cost is now 125 Syrian pounds (£1.12)
for one pack. Here we sell it at 50 Syrian pounds (45p) for two bags. We
distribute some for free for those who cannot pay.”
The bakery works constantly. Inside, barrows filled with
dough were heaved onto a conveyor belt that chopped it into round and
flat segments, before pushing the dough into a giant oven. Workers
packed the steaming flatbread in bags.
“I am from Jabhat al Nusra. All the managers of all the
bakeries are,” said Abu Fattah, the manager. “This makes sure that
nobody steals.”
In essence, Al Qaeda is taking over neighborhoods upon a
mountain of US-provided flour, in bakeries overrun and held at the
barrels of US-provided guns.
With this in mind, it becomes clear that not only has America
traded in its liberty and dignity for the illusion of safety, but they
have done so in the face of fear manufactured and intentionally
perpetuated by their own government - a government willfully using the
very terror organizations they hold over the American people's heads as
justification for an ever-expanding police state at home, as an
international mercenary force with which to target their geopolitical
enemies abroad.
It is an illusion of both terror and security, masterfully
implemented with a myriad of propagandists and corporate-financier
interests working in coordination to foist this scheme upon Western
civilization and beyond. It is essential to identify these
corporate-financier interests, boycott them, and permanently replace
them with local solutions - lest we be bent eternally to this charade,
without liberty, without dignity, and clearly, without safety.
________________________________________________________________
Sources: Islam Times
Thank You For Reading
کوئی تبصرے نہیں:
ایک تبصرہ شائع کریں